Answer:
The correct answer is option d.
Explanation:
The most effective model to understand the effect of change of a variable on other variable is by assuming other factors to be constant. This simplifies the model and helps in easily understanding the relationship between the two variables.
Though the assumption of other things being constant does not apply in the real world, it is still used as otherwise change in other factors would complicate the model. If several factors change it would be difficult to understand the relationship between variables.
Here, to study the effect of change in the price of grapes on the market for wine, it is necessary to assume other factors such as income, consumer preferences, etc to be constant.
Answer:
Journal Entries
Date Account Titles and Explanation Debit Credit
Oct. 1 Cash $34,040
Common Stock $34,040
(To record the cash is invested in the business)
Oct. 2 No Journal Entry $0
Oct. 3 Office Furniture $4,110
Accounts Payable $4,110
(To record the purchase of office furniture on account)
Oct. 6 Accounts Receivable $10,780
Service Revenue $10,780
(To record the services provided but cash is not yet collected)
Oct. 10 Cash $165
Service Revenue $165
(To record the services provided by cash)
Oct. 27 Accounts Payable $690
Cash $690
(To record the payment made on accounts payable
relating to office furniture)
Oct. 30 Salaries Expense $2,740
Cash $2,740
(To record the payment of salaries to the assistant)
<span>Technically, Kyle lied to Patrick about the time at which he would punch him. However, there is no contract to prove that this was what was said on the phone (heresay). Additionally, it does not mention that there was any sort of agreement or consideration made between the two of them regarding this. And even if there was, there might be a legality issue due to the fact that punching is both assault and battery when committed on a person, so the contract may not even be enforceable.
In terms of civil torts, Kyle didn't really commit anything that is pursuable in court, but did commit battery and assault. If Patrick fell or hit his head further and was injured/killed, he would be liable for an involuntary action, of which would be manslaughter if Patrick died. He would also be able to be sued for wrongful death by Patrick's family.</span>
The simple rate of return on the investment is closest to: <u>34.5%</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
<em><u>Given</u></em>:
Current salvage value = $15,000
Cost of new machine = $408,000
Cash operating cost = $141,000
Simple Return on Investment is Calculated as follows:-
Simple rate of return on the investment = Net Operating Cost Saved/ Initial Investment X 100
So Simple Return = 141000/408000 X 100
= 34.5%
The simple rate of return on the investment is closest to: 34.5%
The court which you were sentenced to go to. thats where i wrote mine to