Answer:
B) no, because the corresponding angles are not congruent
Step-by-step explanation:
Similar triangles must have proportional sides, as well as congruent corresponding angles. In this instance, we can see that the angles are not <em>congruent</em>, and so there is no need to solve for proportion.
~
Answer:
-14.120 Radians
Step-by-step explanation:
To convert, use this angle degrees to radians formula:
Radians = Degrees x ( Pi / 180)
Try using this formula
The correct answer is actually choice D.
Answer: x = -7
Concept:
From the given graph, we can see that it is an isosceles triangle since the two base angles are congruent.
In geometry, an isosceles triangle is a triangle that has two sides of equal length.
If you are still confused, you may refer to the attachment below for a graphical explanation or tell me.
Solve:
<u>Given information</u>
First Side = 7
Second Side = x + 14
<u>Given expression deducted from the definition of an isosceles triangle</u>
Second Side = First Side
<u>Substitute values into the expression</u>
x + 14 = 7
<u>Subtract 14 on both sides</u>
x + 14 - 14 = 7 - 14
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af37c/af37c54da674bc2a9a2aa420bb4e610ba22e92ab" alt="\boxed{x=-7}"
Hope this helps!! :)
Please let me know if you have any questions