When deciding whether to undertake a large public works project the government must determine not only the costs, but also the benefits for the community.
There are three main methods for assessing the impact of large scale resource developments:
cost-revenue: evaluates the costs and the revenues resulting from the project only for the public sector.
cost-effectiveness: evaluates the costs of a project or providing a service and the achievement of a desired objective.
And the broadest method and correct answer for this question is the <u>cost-benefits analysis</u>: it compares the tangible and intangible costs and benefits for the community. It considers both of them not only in the public sector but also for the private sector, business owners, individuals and other community factors that would be benefited.
Here is the worldwide law followed in the given scenario :
"<span>According to the Presidential Succession Act of 1792, the Senate </span>president <span>was next in line after the vice president for the presidency which is followed by the Speaker of the House."
Hence,
</span>Speaker of the house is <span>the next in line for the presidency.
Therefore,
The best answer is :
</span><span>B) Speaker of the House</span>
Hi,
I can try to give you some ideas:
One problem in the US is the big wealth gap: the fact that some people make very little money and others make a lot. Some actions in this direction are already there, but more minimum wage laws could help lift the poor out of poverty
Another problem is the huge college debt: one revolution would be introducing very cheap state-funded education (which could be for example more competetive to get into).
This is just some ideas, let me know what you think:)
The correct answer is "The Virginia Plan." The Virginia Plan was a brilliant study explaining government and the US Constitution. It was brought out and being debated but at the end, it was the Virginia Plan.
Answer:
double blind study
Explanation:
The technique of separating the study group into two and one receiving placebo and the other receiving the substance serves to eliminate the psychological effects of patients and to capture the actual effect of a substance studied on each person's organism. However, there are studies in which not even the researcher knows which group received each substance, this type of study is called double blind study. This tactic serves to eliminate the selection bias that can happen in the researcher. If he knows which group received placebo and which group received the substance, he or she may, albeit unintentionally, make a subjective judgment of the experiment. However, by using the double-blind study, the researcher will not have any influence on the results, he or she will only observe the results without any psychological interference.