As trapes so when the enemy would attack the planted explosives would go off and kill multiple people
Answer and Explanation:
Given that this is a second price bid auction whereby the second highest bid is the price that the highest bidder pays for the item up for auction sale, so that b1>b2 then b1 gets item for the price of b2.
Truthfulness of true value is the dominant strategy here which means each player should aim to be truthful with their bid regarding their true value regardless of what other bidders are bidding. Therefore truthfulness of value is the optimal strategy with the best payoff for bidders
It’s definitely is a huge problem. I would suggest just ignoring them and reporting them.
Answer:
The correct answer is 11.28%
Explanation:
Solution
Recall that:
Investment center A Investment center B
Investment center income $ 530,000 $ 640,000
Investment center average
invested assets $ 4,700,000 $ 3,100,000
Now,
We calculate for return on investment (ROI) for Investment Center A
The ROI A=Investment center income/Average invested assets which is
= (530000/4,700,000)
=11.28%
Answer: 1. No.
2. Yes.
Explanation:
Price Discrimination is a pricing strategy where suppliers/producers or sellers sell a good to different people at different prices depending largely on their preference and/or capacity to pay for the commodity i.e, if you want it more, you are charged more.
1. Johnny did not like to play Hopscotch, so offering Suzie one day of Hopscotch for two days of bug hunting is fair and no price discrimination occured as he did not offer these terms to someone else who's game he did not like.
2. Sam knew that Johnny really liked playing Slaps so he leveraged on that and offered him more expensive terms so to speak than he did to Bill even though he liked playing the both games equally. This means that he charged Johnny more than Bill simply because Johnny liked and preferred his game alot which is Price discrimination.
