Answer:
$23.6 per share
Explanation:
Given that,
Total common equity = $5,500,000
Shares outstanding = 250,000
Net income = $525,000
Dividends paid out = $125,000
Total value at the end:
= Total common equity + Net income - Dividends paid out
= $5,500,000 + $525,000 - $125,000
= $5,900,000
Therefore,
Book value per share at 2014 year end:
= Total value at the end ÷ No. of shares outstanding
= $5,900,000 ÷ 250,000
= $23.6 per share
Explanation:
Compare and Contrast ->
Roles of the federal government -> Promoter & Regulator of industrial growth
U.S.Government => Promoter & Regulator of industrial growth
Pacific Railway Act (1862)-They have been granted 20 square miles of land per 1 mile of the track laid down. It strongly encouraged the construction of transcontinental railway lines, contributing to five different transcontinental roads: Union Pacific RR, Central Pacific RR, South Pacific RR, North Pacific RR and the Great North. The Grants Act of Morrill Land (1862)-gave state free land.
U.S.Government => Roles of the federal government
Sherman Antitrust Act (1890)The purpose was to promote economic competition through the regulation of shares, cartels and monopolies. It was very uncompromisingly applied Interstate Trade Act (1887). It also prohibits discrimination against shippers and pays more on the same train for shorter routes than for longer routes.
Thesis:
In the 19th Century and in themid-19th Century, the government of the United States was much more a proponent of industrialisation then an industrialisation regulator than a regulator.
In the year 1862, for instance, congress took place on the Pacific Railway Act, which gave the railway lines 20 acres per mile. This eventually culminated in five transcontinental trains: Union Pacific Railways, Central Pacific Railways, North American Railways, South Pacific Railways, and the Great North.In end, this resulted in the creation of booming towns in the west, encouraging manufacturers to relocate to their inhabitants and enabling businesses to sell their products to remote locations that were once hard to reach. Congress also enacted Morrill's 1861 Tariff Act which substituted for a higher tariff for the limited import tariff inserted in 1816. This shielded businesses from foreign competitors and increased their profits so that they could increase their power. The US government in general has been a more aggressive manufacturing supporter.
Answer and Explanation:
Arguments for U.S. Company offshoring:
1. Cost savings:
Companies usually offshore manufacturing or services to developing countries where wages are low, thus resulting in cost savings. These savings are passed on to the customers, shareholders and managers of these companies.
2. Skills:
The competitive advantage of nations often means that some countries or regions develop a much better ecosystem for certain types of industries. This means there is better availability of skilled human resources in that region for specific types of tasks. For example, India and the Philippines have a large pool of English-speaking, college educated youth; as well as a mature training infrastructure; that makes it ideal for business process outsourcing. Therefore, many companies choose to offshore certain business functions (e.g. call centers for customer support) to these locations.
Arguments for U.S. Company offshoring:
1. Quality Control:
While companies can set quality standards for work performed by foreign employees, language and cultural barriers, as well as overseas supply chains, can present barriers to quality control. Products made overseas can be flawed because of out-of-date or worn equipment in overseas factories, or substandard raw materials. In 2000, for example, Masterlock had to recall more than 750,000 locks made in China. Worn dies at the Chinese factory produced locks that could be pulled apart without a key.
2. Public Image:
In times of high unemployment in the United States, sending jobs out of the country can hurt a company’s public image. Fewer regulations in other countries can make it less expensive for American factories to operate, but environmental damage and labor abuses that make the news can tarnish the image of companies involved there. Consumers have organized boycotts against companies that use child labor or sweatshops to produce clothing and shoes. In response, companies such as Nike, Dell and Gap have established codes of conduct for their suppliers.
Answer:
solar
Explanation:
The future in energy generation is the solar energy. The solar energy is the heat and light energy that is obtain from the sun energy. It is the renewable energy an done of the cleanest source of energy. The industry experts predicts that United States will double the installation of solar cells to four million by the year 2023 in order to harvest these solar power. The solar photovoltaic cells convert sunlight into electricity. By 2024, the renewable electricity is predicted to increase by 1 200 GW.
Answer:
b and c and maybe if i could i would take them to my place for shelter
Explanation:
