1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sedbober [7]
3 years ago
8

During the American Revolution, why did many African-American slaves fight for the British and against the colonists?

History
2 answers:
suter [353]3 years ago
8 0
During the American Revolution, the reason why many African-American slaves fought for the British and against the colonists is that C.The British guaranteed African-American slaves that they would be liberated if they fought on the side of the British during the Revolution.
faltersainse [42]3 years ago
4 0
The answer is C. The British promised slaves freedom
You might be interested in
Which event marked the end of the anglo saxon period of british literure?
Pavel [41]
The Norman invasion of England in 1066 :)
6 0
3 years ago
What was the main argument in favor of annexing Texas into the United States and what were the main arguments against annexing T
Kazeer [188]

Answer:

Mexico won independence from Spain in 1821. At that time, Mexico’s northern provinces included California, New Mexico, and Texas.

When Mexico founded the province of Texas in 1821, the land was very sparsely populated, so Texans actively recruited settlers from the United States to help grow the region’s population. Soon, Stephen Austin—after whom Austin, Texas is named—was selling plots of land to American settlers from a large land grant his father had received from the Mexican government; meanwhile, other settlers from the United States—especially from the American South—were moving to Mexican Texas.

By 1830, there were 7,000 settlers from the United States living in Mexican Texas. But tensions between the Mexican government and settlers from the United States grew as Mexico unsuccessfully attempted to halt further immigration and settlers pushed back against Mexican legal codes. These regulatory laws required those living in Mexico—including those living in Texas—to become Mexican, convert to Roman Catholicism, file legal documents in Spanish, and (after Mexico abolished slavery in 1829) end the practice of slavery. In reality, however, Mexico continued to allow settlers from the United States to bring slaves into the territory as “indentured servants.”

In 1835, settlers from the United States who lived in Texas formed a provisional government, and in 1836 called for independence. In turn, the Mexican government deployed the Mexican leader Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna and his troops into the region in an effort to regain political control.

The settlers in Texas from the United States, together with the active support of Tejanos (Texans of Spanish origin), sought to hold their ground against Santa Anna’s advancing troops.

In March of 1836, following a thirteen day siege, Santa Anna’s 5,000 troops attacked and killed 187 American and Tejano defenders at the battle of the Alamo--a mission-fortress outside San Antonio. Among the dead were Davy Crockett, Jim Bowie, and commander William Travis. “Remember the Alamo” became, thereafter, a battle cry.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When Texas first asked to be
denis23 [38]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

President Martin van Buren refrained from annexing Texas after the Mexicans threatened war

7 0
2 years ago
What are the 2 different accounts of Constantine's famous battle at the Milvian Bridge
zzz [600]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

The two different accounts of Constantine's famous battle at the Milvian Bridge were the following. He won the battle and as the angel promised in his dream, so Constantine converted into Christianism. And with this victory, he became the only and absolute ruler of the Roman Empire.

The battle at the Milvian Bridge was fought on October 28, 312. It confronted Constantine's troops against Maxentius' troops, the other Roman ruler. The battle was held at Milvian Bridgen, right over the Tiber River in Rome.

4 0
3 years ago
How does Jean Bodin define absolute rule?
sammy [17]

The writings of Jean Bodin provides us with an early theorisation of the idea of sovereignty even though the examples he uses are quite extensive. Essential to Bodin's notion of sovereignty is that the power the sovereign holds must be absolute and permanent. If a ruler holds absolute power for the duration of his life he can be said to be sovereign. In contrast, an elected official or some other person that holds limited powers can not be described to be sovereign. Although at times Bodin suggests that the people are sovereign, his definition of sovereignty as absolute, unlimited and enduring power points purposively towards a positive association of sovereignty and a singular monarchical, or even tyrannical, power.

Another qualification that Bodin introduces into the definition of sovereignty as absolute and perpetual is one that will become increasingly important in subsequent theorisations, culminating in the work of Carl Schmitt. For Bodin, a sovereign prince is one who is exempt from obedience to the laws of his predecessors and more importantly, those issued by himself. Sovereignty rests in being above, beyond or excepted from the law. Although it occupies a subordinate place in Bodin's theorisation, it could be said that this exception from being subject to the law is the quintessential condition of sovereignty in so far as it is understood politically.

Although for Bodin sovereignty is characterised by absolute and perpetual power he goes on to make a series of important qualifications to this concept. These come from two principle concerns. The first is real politics - Bodin seems to be aware that absolute power could licence behaviour injurious to sovereign authority. Hence for example a sovereign cannot and should not confiscate property nor break contractual agreements made with other sovereigns, estates nor private persons. The second reason is Bodin's underlying theological notion of divine authority and natural law. A sovereign may put aside civil law, but he must not question natural law (in which it appears right of property is sanctioned). Saying this, it is ultimately from this divine authority that the earthly right of sovereign power is legitimated. The prince literary does god's bidding, and yet by virtue of this can do wrong. Hopefully this helps out some :)

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the state of president john f. kennedy's domestic agenda when he was assassinated?
    6·1 answer
  • What agency has been criticized for not adequately protecting consumers against faulty sunscreen labeling?
    9·2 answers
  • When you had to work with a particularly difficult individual, what approach did you take to establish a relationship with him o
    15·1 answer
  • Why was taxation without representation considered a violation of the social contract
    12·2 answers
  • what connections do you see between the economic and social despair americans such as czolgosz felt and popularity of theodore r
    12·1 answer
  • The Women's Rights Movements and the Civil Rights Movements continue even in current times.
    10·2 answers
  • For many Texans, Reconstruction was not over until ___________ and the Radical Republican legislature were no longer in office.
    7·1 answer
  • Which conductor became known as the “President of the Underground Railroad”? whos down to talk..
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes Achilles' relationship to Agamemnon in the Iliad?
    13·1 answer
  • Help me please I can’t figure it out.
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!