Answer:
The answer is: Edgar will receive $37,000
Explanation:
- Dowd's share of the company's losses is $80,000
- Edgar's share of the company's losses is $60,000
- Frost's share of the company's losses is $40,000
- Grant's share of the company's losses is $20,000
But since Grant is not willing to give more money to the partnership to cover his losses, the $9,000 difference must be divided by the remaining three partners. So they will divide Grant's losses as follows:
- Dowd's share of the Grant's losses is $3,600
- Edgar's share of the Grant's losses is $2,700
- Frost's share of the Grant's losses is $1,800
Then you add up all the losses the three remaining partners had:
- Dowd' total losses $83,600
- Edgar's total losses $62,700
- Frost's total losses $21,800
So when the partnership was dissolved, Edgar should have received $100,000 (capital) - $62,700 (total losses) = $37,200
I selected answer A since they probably rounded down Edgar's share to $37,000 (nearest possible choice).
Deposit (PV): $10,000
Years between the 18th month and the fifth year (n) = 3.5
(I)=7% yearly interest rate
Simple interest approach accumulated value equals P*(1+(i*n)).
=1000*(1+(7%*3.5))
=1245
Thus, the total value at the end of five years will be $1245.
Compound interest method accumulated value equals P*(1+i)n
=1000*(1+7%)^3.5
=1267.19
Therefore, the total value after five years will be $1267.19.
Learn more about simple interest here ;
brainly.com/question/25845758
#SPJ4
Answer:
Letter B is correct. Unity of command.
Explanation:
Unity of command is defined as t<u>he importance of respecting hierarchy within an organization.</u> The orders are given by the superiors and the subordinates must comply with them, that is, the orders of those who are at the top of the hierarchy must always be respected and only the superiors are allowed to change them.
When there is a violation of the command unit, several related conflicts can arise, such as lack of consensus among teams, disorganization, failure in the communication process, which negatively impact organizational effectiveness.
Answer:
neither she nor her supervisor has any demonstrable reason to access such information.
Explanation:
When security measures are introduced in information system access in an organisation, an individual is limited to only a defined set of data.
Access to data outside one's normal job role requires a request for addition of such access.
In the given instance Northwestern Data Systems has adopted a new organizational approach that ensures employees have access to the only data they need.
Stacy, an administrative assistant requests a report regarding disciplinary action on a manager outside her department.
She will not be able to get it because she should normally not be able to discipline a manager.
So she can't access it because neither she nor her supervisor has any demonstrable reason to access such information.
