Answer:
The correct answer would be option C, He will be able to gain knowledge and support from the hotel business to run the franchise.
Explanation:
Franchise is basically a contract between two parties in which one of the party who is owning the business is ready to sell his business rights to use its name and products to the other party. The other party can open the same business with the same name and products or services and run that business. In this type of contract, a continuous help and support is given to the franchisee to run the business. So if John being an entrepreneur wants to enter into the franchise contract, then he will surly be able to gain knowledge and support from the hotel business to run the franchise.
Answer:
Of course this is a retaliatory action. Troy filed a complaint for discriminatory harassment against Cinthia and she answers back by discriminating against Troy even more. All she needed to do was stop discriminating against Troy, she wasn't supposed to increase discrimination against him. This is an example of what shouldn't happen.
Explanation:
In this scenario, dressing formally during business meetings is probably a cultural imperative for the French
Explanation:
Cultural imperatives are traditions that you have to comply with when you want to succeed.
Relationship building is an example of a cultural imperatives .
Business understands the importance of building a relationship in many Asian countries such as China and Japan and Latin America.
Businessmen are not doing company business, they are doing business with people. It is a cultural necessity to spend time developing this relationship in these countries before you start up your business. Always underestimate your business partners ' value in building trust. It makes or breaks an agreement. Among Asian countries, another moral necessity is to make no one lose face. Never raise your voice or publicly threaten anyone. You will struggle in your company if you are ignorant of these cultural imperatives.
Answer: there will be too much pollution
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that government officials have set an emissions tax to reduce pollution and that the optimal tax should have been $1,500 but government officials have set the tax equal to $500.
It should be noted that due to the fact that the optimal tax has been set below the equilibrium, this will lead to a rise in pollution as the people will be aware that they're paying less than the optimal level which will lead to more pollution. An increase in the optimal tax will have help in reducing the pollution.
