1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pashok25 [27]
3 years ago
9

Solve 0.05p-0.02(5-2p)=0.05(p-2)-0.12

Mathematics
1 answer:
Montano1993 [528]3 years ago
8 0
0.05p-0.02(5-2p)=0.05(p-2)-0.12 

0.05p-0.02(5-2p)=0.05(p-2)-0.12:p 


0.05p-0.1+0.04p=0.05p-0.1-0.12
 
  |Expand \ the \ equation| 

0.09p-0.1=0.05p-0.1-0.12
 
 

0.09p-0.1=0.05p-0.22 


0.09p-0.1-0.05p=-0.22
 

  |Subtract \ 0.05p \ from \ both \ sides| 


0.04p-0.1=-0.22
 
 


0.04p=-0.22+0.1
 
  |Add \ 0.1 \ to \ both \ sides| 


0.04p=-0.12
 
 

0.04p/0.04=-0.12/0.04
  |Divide \ both \ sides \ by \ 0.04| 

p=-3 

\star \ Hence \ Solved
You might be interested in
During the first part of a​ trip, a canoeist travels 18 miles at a certain speed. the canoeist travels 4 miles on the second par
storchak [24]
We can set it up like this, where <em>s </em>is the speed of the canoeist:

\frac{18}{s} + \frac{4}{s-5} = 3

To make a common denominator between the fractions, we can multiply the whole equation by s(s-5):

s(s-5)[\frac{18}{s} + \frac{4}{s-5} = 3] \\ 18(s-5)+4s=3s(s-5) \\ 18s - 90+4s=3 s^{2} -15s

If we rearrange this, we can turn it into a quadratic equation and factor:

18s - 90+4s=3 s^{2} -15s \\ 22s-90=3 s^{2} -15s \\ 3 s^{2} -37s+90=0 \\ (3s-10)(s-9)=0 \\ s= \frac{10}{3} ,9

Technically, either of these solutions would work when plugged into the original equation, but I would use the second solution because it's a little "neater."  We have the speed for the first part of the trip (9 mph); now we just need to subtract 5mph to get the speed for the second part of the trip.

9-5 = 4

The canoeist's speed on the first part of the trip was 9mph, and their speed on the second part was 4mph.
5 0
4 years ago
A salesperson earns a commission of 429$ for selling 3300$ in merchandise.
butalik [34]

Answer:

13%

Step-by-step explanation:

429 commission ÷3300 merchandise sold =0.13 percent

7 0
3 years ago
Check all that apply
adell [148]
So we would want to isolate x. Start by multiplying both sides by -3. Since we are multiplying negative number, we flip the sign.

So that would be x ≥12. That means x should be greater than or equal to 12.

So now it's easy to answer.

C, D, E would be the answer.
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ms. Swanson asked the question, "How does knowing the fact 6 × 5 6×5 help you find 60 × 500 60×500?" Maria answered, "I know 6 ×
Allushta [10]

Answer:

Correct answer is 30,000

Step-by-step explanation:

From multiplication :

6 * 5 = 30

Now moving to:

60 * 500

Number of ending zeros in both values = 3 ; (000)

This 3 0's will be placed at the end of the result of multiplying 6 by 5

Hence,

6 * 5 = 30

60 * 500 = 30+000 = 30,000

Hence, 60 * 500 = 30000

3 0
3 years ago
Suppose that the neighboring cities of Tweed and Ledee are long-term rivals. Neal, who was born and raised in Tweed, is confiden
Makovka662 [10]

Complete Question

The option to the blank space are shown on the first uploaded image

Answer:

Neal's decision is to <u>fail to reject </u> the <u>null hypothesis</u>   (p 0.066). There is <u>no sufficient </u> evidence to <u>prove</u> the claim that the average electricity consumption of <u>all  Ledee household </u>is <u>greater than</u> , <u>854.28 kWh</u>

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The population mean is  \mu  =  854.11

   The sample size is  n =  65

    The sample mean is  \= x  =  879.28 \  kWh

    The standard deviation is  \sigma  =  133.29 \  kWh

    The level of significance is  \alpha  =  0.05

     The  null hypothesis is  H_o:  \mu = 854.11

     The  alternative hypothesis is  H_a  :  \mu > 854.11

     The  t-statistics is  t  =  1.522

      The  p-value is p-value  =  0.066

Now from the given data we can see that

         p-value <  \alpha

Generally when this is the case , we fail to reject the null hypothesis

   So

Neal's decision is to <u>fail to reject </u> the <u>null hypothesis</u>   (p 0.066). There is <u>no sufficient </u> evidence to <u>prove</u> the claim that the average electricity consumption of <u>all  Ledee household </u>is <u>greater than</u> , <u>854.28 kWh</u>            

     

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain why a scale of 1/2 inch to 1 foot is equivalent to a scale of 1:24
    10·1 answer
  • Bailey writes the expression g2 + 14g + 40 to represent the area of a planned school garden in square feet. If g = 5, what are t
    15·2 answers
  • What's the answer to 20 divided by 2(5+)=
    10·1 answer
  • Find the volume of the pyramid below.
    7·2 answers
  • 43 (x) =48<br> Could you explain how to do it please?
    14·1 answer
  • PLZ ANSWER FAST!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Convert 54 yards to cm
    11·2 answers
  • How do I tell whether the ordered pair is a solution of the given system ? {3x+y=4 and x-3y=-4
    10·1 answer
  • 5) What property is shown here?
    7·1 answer
  • A circle with radius r is inscribed inside a square with a side length s. Use 3.14 for TT. Round answers to the nearest hundredt
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!