We can set it up like this, where <em>s </em>is the speed of the canoeist:

To make a common denominator between the fractions, we can multiply the whole equation by s(s-5):
![s(s-5)[\frac{18}{s} + \frac{4}{s-5} = 3] \\ 18(s-5)+4s=3s(s-5) \\ 18s - 90+4s=3 s^{2} -15s](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s%28s-5%29%5B%5Cfrac%7B18%7D%7Bs%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B4%7D%7Bs-5%7D%20%3D%203%5D%20%5C%5C%2018%28s-5%29%2B4s%3D3s%28s-5%29%20%5C%5C%2018s%20-%2090%2B4s%3D3%20s%5E%7B2%7D%20-15s)
If we rearrange this, we can turn it into a quadratic equation and factor:

Technically, either of these solutions would work when plugged into the original equation, but I would use the second solution because it's a little "neater." We have the speed for the first part of the trip (9 mph); now we just need to subtract 5mph to get the speed for the second part of the trip.

The canoeist's speed on the first part of the trip was 9mph, and their speed on the second part was 4mph.
Answer:
13%
Step-by-step explanation:
429 commission ÷3300 merchandise sold =0.13 percent
So we would want to isolate x. Start by multiplying both sides by -3. Since we are multiplying negative number, we flip the sign.
So that would be x ≥12. That means x should be greater than or equal to 12.
So now it's easy to answer.
C, D, E would be the answer.
Answer:
Correct answer is 30,000
Step-by-step explanation:
From multiplication :
6 * 5 = 30
Now moving to:
60 * 500
Number of ending zeros in both values = 3 ; (000)
This 3 0's will be placed at the end of the result of multiplying 6 by 5
Hence,
6 * 5 = 30
60 * 500 = 30+000 = 30,000
Hence, 60 * 500 = 30000
Complete Question
The option to the blank space are shown on the first uploaded image
Answer:
Neal's decision is to <u>fail to reject </u> the <u>null hypothesis</u> (p 0.066). There is <u>no sufficient </u> evidence to <u>prove</u> the claim that the average electricity consumption of <u>all Ledee household </u>is <u>greater than</u> , <u>854.28 kWh</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean is 
The sample size is 
The sample mean is 
The standard deviation is 
The level of significance is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
The t-statistics is 
The p-value is 
Now from the given data we can see that

Generally when this is the case , we fail to reject the null hypothesis
So
Neal's decision is to <u>fail to reject </u> the <u>null hypothesis</u> (p 0.066). There is <u>no sufficient </u> evidence to <u>prove</u> the claim that the average electricity consumption of <u>all Ledee household </u>is <u>greater than</u> , <u>854.28 kWh</u>