<u>Answer:
</u>
The state statutes would be the sources of law that the legal counsel would not need to consult.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The issue that the white house is concerned about is of direct national interest and has not much to do with the statutes of the states comprising the United States.
- Hence, in order to find a relevant interpretation, the counsel would most likely have to consult the federal statutes and international treaties associated with the issue.
Answer: What is the other motorist likely to do in response, according to the authors of your text:
The other motorist is likely to accept the apology and maybe collect a token fee for repairs.
Explanation: This is because according to the text above which says "It's my fault; I should have been paying closer attention to driving. I'm sorry." That statement alone shows the true sincerity in the apology which would calm the tension or anger of the other motorist. And the matter would likely to be solved amicably.
I believe it’s Page 24 or that’s what it is in my book
This is kinda hard sense they do produce a lot of major industries in the U.S like natural gas, tourism, etc.But as for the BEST answer I'd say D)
Answer:
Functional neuroplasticity
Explanation:
Functional neuroplasticity is the brains ability to alter and adapt the communication between neurons.
