Answer:
It gave people the right to elect members of Parliament.
Explanation:
It could not be a democratic republic because regardless of having a Bill of Rights or not, England was a monarchial government. It could not be that the king could pass laws without Parliament’s approval because the Bill of Rights did the exact opposite; it limited the King’s power. It did not allow Roman Catholics to be kings or queens because it was never explicitly stated on the Bill of Rights. It did give the people individual rights, the rights to elect members to Parliament.
The appropriate response is Medical Perspective. The individuals who hold a medicinal point of view center around organic and physiological factors as reasons for unusual conduct, which is dealt with as an infection, or dysfunctional behavior, and is analyzed through manifestations and cured through treatment. Hospitalization and medications are regularly favored techniques for treatment as opposed to mental examination.
It depends the goal of the argumentative paper. If you are arguing for a clear purpose use the expert testimony because of its credibility. Although if you are arguing and spitballing around about a topic then use your opinion about it.
<span />
The answer to the question would be one then does not discern the footprints of another which is in a way shall be wholly strange and also new. Hope this is the answer and would then be of big help.
