1. Holocaust
2. Final Solution
3. Nuremberg Race Laws
4. Josef Stalin
5. Rationing
6. Scrap metal
7. Japanese
8. Before the Holocaust, Germany passed the Nuremberg Race Laws, which stripped Jews of their citizenship. Once deprived of their status as citizens, the Nazis proceeded to relocate Jews into ghettos and target their businesses for destruction, before removing them to concentration camps to perform forced labor. Eventually, the labor camps became extermination camps.
9. The sheer scale of civilian casualties was different from any previous war. Civilians were targeted, and their deaths outnumbered military deaths. Technology like the atomic bomb or airplanes increased the threat to civilians. Similar to WWI, women stepped into occupations and roles that had previously been performed by men. Also, like WWI, WWII was a total war. The mass extermination of Jews, political and religious dissenters, Roma, and other peoples was unprecedented.
10. Based on the scale of civilian deaths, particularly the brutality of the Nazis and Japanese, students might rationalize the dropping of the bombs, agreeing that the conflict needed to be stopped at all costs. On the other hand, students may also perceive the dropping of the atomic bombs as just as ethically problematic since it, too, was a mass killing of civilians. Students may point to the Japanese internment camps as further evidence that the Allies, specifically the United States, acted out of prejudice.
straight from Pf my guy :)
If there's an economic downturn in a country where the taxes are very high, and those taxes are used for the funding of the numerous social programs, than the country can very quickly face high rates of poverty and maybe even an internal conflict.
If the economy suddenly starts to crumble, the people that work would not be able to support themselves with the paying of very high taxes, thus they will rebel against that in order for the taxes to be lowered down.
On the other hand, that will result in little to no funding for the social programs. That will bring in revolt in the people that are very poor and need those programs, but also the people that do not work by their will but have relied on those money.
These two sides of the picture can easily bring in a lot of violence, tensions, even a revolution.
When it comes to race it usually delayed the admissions of the states into the Union. For example the states with majority population consisting of Mexicans and Native Americans were not allowed into the Union until the Congress opened those lands for white settlers. The issue of gender impacted the admissions less, the difference was in the level of commitment to the women's rights.
There is instances and life connections from the Ancient civilizations to now Modern civilizations.
- The modern life nowadays uses all kinds of advanced technology and ideas for heading towards the current revolution. In the other hand, Ancient Civilizations, there are primitive methods and all natural beauties were preserved.
- The current modern civilizations are the based on computer eras whereas the ancient civilizations are the based on hunting, and Agricultural revolution.
- Their life was based on small gatherers and the family in ancient, but now in the modern, the life is changed based on the power of economy and their own selfish needs.
So, this is the answer of yours. Now Give the Brainliest.
