I have no idea I just need more points so I can ask more questions
first a glass of water is boiled in a kettle or teapot. when the water is still boiling, half a glass of milk is poured into the boiling water. 2 tablespoons of tea powder is added into the boiling content and finally, tea is stirred and served hot.
hope it helped...!
The answer is : The demand would most likely increasing
Phrases such as "all boots must go" tend to be used if the businesses want to restock its warehouse with new products. Because of this, it is very likely that they would sell the boots under a huge discount. According to the law of demand, this decrease in price would increase the number of demand from consumers.
Its linda? i dont knowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
