Answer:
1135.38
Step-by-step explanation:
100%->1015
100-6=94
94%->954.1
--------------------------------------------------
100%->954.1
119%->1135.379
≈1135.38
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
Substitute a = - 6 into the expression, that is
a² + 7a + 8
= (- 6)² + 7(- 6) + 8 = 36 - 42 + 8 = - 6 + 8 = 2
<em>What do you need help with on your homework. You need all the answers?</em>
<em>My friend. I am a teacher at a middle school</em>
Answer: The ball hits the ground at 5 s
Step-by-step explanation:
The question seems incomplete and there is not enough data. However, we can work with the following function to understand this problem:
(1)
Where
models the height of the ball in meters and
the time.
Now, let's find the time
when the ball Sara kicked hits the ground (this is when
):
(2)
Rearranging the equation:
(3)
Dividing both sides of the equation by
:
(4)
This quadratic equation can be written in the form
, and can be solved with the following formula:
(5)
Where:
Substituting the known values:
(6)
Solving we have the following result:
This means the ball hit the ground 5 seconds after it was kicked by Sara.
Answer:
a) Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
b) 
c)
d)
e) For this case since the statistic is lower than the critical value and the p value higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis so then we don't have information to conclude that the true proportion is higher than 0.12
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=1000 represent the random sample selected
X=134 represent the number of young drivers ages 18 – 24 that had an accident
estimated proportion of young drivers ages 18 – 24 that had an accident
is the value that we want to verify
represent the significance level
Confidence=95% or 0.95
z would represent the statistic
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic would be given by:
(1)
Part b
For this case since we are conducting a right tailed test we need to find a critical value in the normal standard distribution who accumulates 0.05 of the area in the right and we got:

Part c
For this case the statistic would be given by:
Part d
The p value can be calculated with the following probability:
Part e
For this case since the statistic is lower than the critical value and the p value higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis so then we don't have information to conclude that the true proportion is higher than 0.12