No, it was not moral because it disrupts what they are already trying to fix. When the people come to take over, the people have no more freedom, they have to listen the people that take over. And the people that take over want money, resources, and land, so that makes it even worse for them because of the fact that they are going through all of their resources, and losing their land faster making them even more poor. Sometimes it isn't morally a good thing because many people can get killed or that the empire does not care about the country's health. Hope this helps! Have a good day.
<span>
</span>
A protective tariff is taxing a foreign good to protect it from foreign theft. Tariff means tax, and protection means what it sounds like, so all together it means a protective tax
Answer:
John Adams did not have enough support from the American people to win his reelection as President in 1800.
There were some serious problems in his presidency, notably the XYZ Affair and the passage of both the Alien and Sedition Acts.Adams's presidency was consumed with problems that arose from the French Revolution, which had also been true for his predecessor. Initially popular with virtually all Americans, the French Revolution began to arouse concerns among the most conservative in the United States after the excesses that commenced in 1792.During the Revolutionary War he served in France and Holland in diplomatic roles, and helped negotiate the treaty of peace. From 1785 to 1788 he was minister to the Court of St. James's, returning to be elected Vice President under George Washington.
Explanation:
but the first part is the answer
