Answer:
- Talking about the conversation with a compliance officer of his firm
- Accept unsolicited trades from costumers in the company's stock
Explanation:
The agent listened to another company's employee talking on the phone about confidential information, that is, private information that the agent should not be listening to, but he has heard and can use it to his company's advantage. Since no one knows that the agent has this information, he can talk about the conversation he has heard with a compliance officer at his company, and he can accept unsolicited dealings from customers on the company's stock.
The fair credit billing act and the electronic fund transfer act provide consumers with legal protection from unfair billing practices.
<h3>What are unfair billing practices?</h3>
Unfair billing practices refer to:
- Unauthorized credit card charges
- Charges due to errors
- Undelivered goods or services.
The accounts affected y the fair credit billing act and the electronic fund transfer act are credit accounts, including:
- Credit cards accounts
- Charge accounts.
Thus, the fair credit billing act and the electronic fund transfer act provide consumers with legal protection from unfair billing practices.
Learn more about unfair billing practices at brainly.com/question/1862829
Answer:
Explanation:
raising the price of one substance may drive users to other harmful substances. Many drugs appear to be close substitutes. For example, states that have criminal penalties for marijuana use tend to have higher teenage consumption of alcohol and tobacco. copy n pasted.
Answer:
D. sometimes double the size
Answer:
1. "Loose lips sink ships." Share certain information can jeopardize OpSec, and result in advantages for enemy troops.
2. 1A should protect ALL speech. censoring specific words is a form of bias. People should instead be taught coping skills when presented with ideas they find objectionable. "Hate speech" presumes there is a speaker and a listener. The speaker can share anything he likes. The listener is the regulated party. When presented with objectionable ideas, he has choices: he can choose the respond calmly and reasonably; he can respond with aggression; or, he can ignore it and walk away.
