The SCOTUS did not rule that T.L.O’s 4th amendment (searches and seizures) rights had been violated. They ruled that the school administrations search of the bag was reasonable under the circumstances (i.e T.L.O. Being a minor and on school property, meaning that while at school, administration is responsible for the well-being and safety of all students, thus allowing them to search T.L.O’s bag for marijuana). A good way to think of it is that while you’re at school, the administration acts as your parents. Your parents don’t need a warrant to search through your room and neither does the administration if you are on school property. The 4th amendment applies to this case because it protects against unlawful searches and seizures (i.e. searches and seizures that are without a warrant). The constitutional question was whether or not T.L.O. Could be charged with a crime/punished or not because the school administration did not have a warrant. However, because the school administration was acting as a loco parentis (latin term for “in place of the parent”) they did not need a warrant to search her bag. Hope this helped!
Respuesta: Una enmienda
Explicación:
Una enmienda se refiere a cualquier modificación o cambio en un documento legal incluyendo una ley o incluso una constitución (documento que resume los principios y leyes de una nación). En el caso de una enmienda a la constitución el propósito de estas es adaptar las leyes y principios constitucionales a nuevas realidades o modificar aquellos que con el tiempo han resultado obsoletos e ineficientes. De esta forma la constitución logra adaptarse a nuevas realidades, épocas, situaciones, etc. En este contexto un cambio a la Constitución es una enmienda.
If he has fully paid off the truck and doesn’t owe any payments then he owns the truck so it is his property.
I think
Answer:
Having no insurance and or DWI
Explanation:
