Answer:
“Sub-Saharan African countries' own trade and transport policies incorporate a substantial anti-export bias.” transport problems might have contributed to the relative decline of sub-Saharan Africa's exports in global trade, and whether domestic freight and transport policies have been a contributing factor.
Answer:
Cognitive dissonance
Explanation:
In psychology, the term cognitive dissonance refers to the mental discomfort experienced by a person who holds contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values.
This discomfort is triggered by a situation in which a person's belief is contradicted by new evidence perceived by the person so the person will try to find a way to resolve the contradiction to reduce their discomfort.
In this example, Sonya thought sororities were filled with snobs, however during her first week in campus she was approached by a sorority member who invited her to a social function.
We can see that <u>Sonya's beliefs about sororities were contradicted by the new evidence she perceived when she attended the social function</u>, this made her feel cognitive dissonance and <u>her way to resolve the contradiction was to conclude that sororities do a lot of good things for the community.</u>
Thus, Sonya's change in attitude to match her behavior relates to cognitive dissonance.
In interviewing Demonstrate Professional Competence and Personal Integrity concerns, realities, and ethical considerations.
The legal research skills that paralegals use to assist attorneys primarily focus on researching individual cases, organizing case files, contacting and interviewing witnesses, gathering supporting evidence, and Drafting legal documents.
One of the most common ethical dilemmas in business, and one she often faces as a paralegal, is offering advice beyond her knowledge and experience. Even with your best efforts, you may accidentally break this rule when answering legal questions from clients.
Her five contemporary ethical issues in law enforcement concern police officers' off-duty lives, respect for the law and their rights, use of necessary force, fair conduct, and profiling.
Learn more about considerations at
brainly.com/question/27027695
#SPJ4
Answer: Wendy did not use random assignment
Explanation: Wendy's failure to randomly assign participants or subject to his research will pose a threat to the internal validity of his study. The internal validity of a study simply refers to the structure of an experiment and it's trustworthiness in establishing causal relationship between the applied treatment used a study and the observed outcome. Wendy's decision to ignore random assignment and opt for a manual assignment of subject to each treatment will pose a threat to the structure of his study and hence the establishment of a causal relationship between the treatment t and outcome of the study.
I believe this is D! Hope it helps you in any way.
