Answer:
The answer is "NOT"
Step-by-step explanation:
- To demonstrate a similar statement we want to have yet another side or some other angle, however, the third section is not proportional.
- Its sides were equivalent in proportions (yeah sure they are) + corner by the by is not given.
- There is no triangle angle provided so, that we can not enforce the SAS argument.
- It is not evidence of similarity between ABC ≈DEF.
4n-40=7(-2n+2)
4n-40=-14n+14
subtract -4n from both sides
-40 = -18n +14
subtract -14 from both sides
-54=-18n
divide both sides by -18
3 = n
180-this number or 360 because its a circumference
g(x)= -|x+2| -1
The domain is the input values, or x values
it is all real number
The range is the output values, or g(x)
the absolute value at is smallest is 0
0-1 is -1 this is the max since the absolute value is multiplied by -1
g(x) <=-1
the output is less than or equal to -1
Answer:
58
Step-by-step explanation:
can I have brainliest
