1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Triss [41]
3 years ago
11

Evaluate the following statement: “If a signature on a check is forged, the customer will never be responsible for the amount on

the check.”
Law
1 answer:
Digiron [165]3 years ago
6 0
This is true ! Generally, if anybody forges a sign on a cheque, the individual whose sign was forged isn’t then obliged to honour that cheque, & their banking firm doesn’t have to pay it. The cheque with a forged sign is just a worthless paper i.e. a ‘nullity’.
You might be interested in
How to murder sunny in a good way?
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

Attack on Titan style.

Explanation:

why not

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does being in custody triggers the suspect Miranda rights?
OleMash [197]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

I worked for a lawyer for two years and studied law, so you can trust me.

When you take a suspect under custody and they are put in cuffs, you must tell them there rights. This applies to any law enforcement officer.

6 0
4 years ago
What is protein?<br><br>Help pls​
blagie [28]

Explanation:

A substance that contains of amino acid and are present in all living organism

Does that help??

Sorry if not

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In a case involving internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the j
ziro4ka [17]

Considering the legal practice and standards, it is <u>false</u> that in a case involving internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the jurisdiction online.

<h3>What is Jurisdiction in online transactions?</h3>

Jurisdiction online transaction is a legal issue that seeks to solve or justify court jurisdiction over a case or dispute involving a foreign defendant.

In this case, the normal principle state that having a foreign defendant access a website is not satisfactory to establish jurisdiction.

Therefore, for a court to justify exercising jurisdiction over a foreign defendant in Internet-based transactions, there must be multiple contacts in addition to the accessibility of a website.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "False."

Learn more about Jurisdiction of court here: brainly.com/question/10377896

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct answer.
Olegator [25]

Answer:

C and A

Explanation:

the other 2 have no relation to forensics

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Write a paragraph on your opinion on why the two-party system is hurting America
    15·1 answer
  • True or False: Failure to pay child support can result in the suspension of your license.
    13·2 answers
  • _________________________ of DNA technology is important when the results are to be used as evidence in a court of law.
    15·1 answer
  • Are bodies of nonelected government officials and/or an administrative
    6·2 answers
  • What is the most important power of the Supreme Court? Explain
    13·1 answer
  • Citizens in just system know why and to whom tax is paid *<br><br><br><br>FALSE<br><br>TRUE​
    7·1 answer
  • Allison is analyzing the fracture pattern of a window. She sees that the fracture lines encircle the point of impact. What type
    10·1 answer
  • Question 5 of 10
    15·2 answers
  • If emergency vehicles are responding to an emergency, you need to
    7·2 answers
  • What are the three major stages of the juvenile court process?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!