The correct answer is: <u>'the colonists response to the Stamp Act'.</u>
A boycott is a group's denial to have any type of dealing with an organization. In this case, the reaction to the Stamp Act was a reaction from the colonials that consisted on riots and attacks towards the tax collectors.
Referring to what the previous person said^^Actually the point of this app is to help people answer questions and to ask questions ._.
Anywhooo... if the money supply in the economy goes up, then sometimes businesses would lower prices. But some businesses that make a steady income from their money supply, usually don’t lower prices even if the supply is up because they like to keep a steady profit.
If money in the economy decreases, the prices go up so that businesses can make more profit to up their money supply. So that they can stay in business by making enough profit to up their money supply.
-HOPE THAT HELPED!!! <3
Allows citizens to vote for representatives within government.
Answer:
a wall dividing East and West Berlin erected by the Soviets
Explanation:
The Iron Curtain formed the imaginary boundary dividing Europe into two separate areas from the end of World War II in 1945 until the end of the Cold War in 1991. The term symbolized efforts by the Soviet Union to block itself and its satellite states from open contact with the West and non-Soviet-controlled areas.
<span>Plato, In "The Republic," Plato sums up his views in an image of ignorant humanity, trapped in the depths and not even aware of its own limited perspective. The rare individual escapes the limitations of that cave and, through a long, tortuous intellectual journey, discovers a higher realm, a true reality, with a final, almost mystical awareness of Goodness as the origin of everything that exists. Such a person is then the best equipped to govern in society, having a knowledge of what is ultimately most worthwhile in life and not just a knowledge of techniques; but that person will frequently be misunderstood by those ordinary folks back in the cave who haven't shared in the intellectual insight. If he were living today, Plato might replace his rather awkward cave metaphor with a movie theater, with the projector replacing the fire, the film replacing the objects which cast shadows, the shadows on the cave wall with the projected movie on the screen, and the echo with the loudspeakers behind the screen. The essential point is that the prisoners in the cave are not seeing reality, but only a shadowy representation of it. The importance of the allegory lies in Plato's belief that there are invisible truths lying under the apparent surface of things which only the most enlightened can grasp. Used to the world of illusion in the cave, the prisoners at first resist enlightenment, as students resist education. But those who can achieve enlightenment deserve to be the leaders and rulers of all the rest. At the end of the passage, Plato expresses another of his favorite ideas: that education is not a process of putting knowledge into empty minds, but of making people realize that which they already know. This notion that truth is somehow embedded in our minds was also powerfully influential for many centuries.
I hope this help</span>
