1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Setler79 [48]
3 years ago
11

A family has two cars. the first car has a fuel efficiency of 30 miles per gallon of gas and the second has a fuel efficiency of

35 miles per gallon of gas. during one particular week, the two cars went a combined total of 1975 miles, for a total gas consumption of 60 gallons. how many gallons were consumed by each of the two cars that week?
Mathematics
1 answer:
jeka57 [31]3 years ago
5 0
X : the gas used by first car in 1 particular week
y : the gas used by second car in 1 particular week
x + y = 60 \\ x = 60 - y
30x + 35y = 1975 \\ 30 \times (60 - y) + 35y = 1975 \\ ... \\ y = 35 \\ x = 60 - y = 60 - 35 = 25

You might be interested in
U is the midpoint of TV. If TU = 6x and TV = 11x + 8, what is TV?
soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

96

Step-by-step explanation:

U is the midpoint of TV, so mTU is half of mTV or mTV = 2 * mTU, so

mTV = 2 * mTU

11x + 8 = 2 (6x)

11x + 8 = 12x

8 = x

mTV = 11x + 8 = 11(8) + 8 = 88 + 8 = 96

4 0
2 years ago
Estimate the number 7.616 to show that the number 76.16 is not correct.
Olenka [21]

Answer: there is a one decimal placement difference

Step-by-step explanation:

7.616 is one decimal less than 76.16 essentially meaning it’s 10 times more than 7.616

4 0
3 years ago
I need help graphing this problem<br>−7x+5y=35 ​
Arturiano [62]

Answer:

slope:  7/5

y-int: (0,7)

hope this helps!!:)

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
A county environmental agency suspects that the fish in a particular polluted lake have elevated mercury levels. To confirm that
suter [353]

Answer:

a. The 95% confidence interval for the difference between means is (0.071, 0.389).

b. There is enough evidence to support the claim that the fish in this particular polluted lake have signficantly elevated mercury levels.

c. They agree. Both conclude that the levels of mercury are significnatly higher compared to a unpolluted lake.

In the case of the confidence interval, we reach this conclusion because the lower bound is greater than 0. This indicates that, with more than 95% confidence, we can tell that the difference in mercury levels is positive.

In the case of the hypothesis test, we conclude that because the P-value indicates there is a little chance we get that samples if there is no significant difference between the mercury levels. This indicates that the values of mercury in the polluted lake are significantly higher than the unpolluted lake.

Step-by-step explanation:

The table with the data is:

Sample 1 Sample 2

0.580    0.382

0.711      0.276

0.571     0.570

0.666    0.366

0.598

The mean and standard deviation for sample 1 are:

M=\dfrac{1}{5}\sum_{i=1}^{5}(0.58+0.711+0.571+0.666+0.598)\\\\\\ M=\dfrac{3.126}{5}=0.63

s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{(n-1)}\sum_{i=1}^{5}(x_i-M)^2}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{4}\cdot [(0.58-(0.63))^2+...+(0.598-(0.63))^2]}\\\\\\            s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{4}\cdot [(0.002)+(0.007)+(0.003)+(0.002)+(0.001)]}\\\\\\            s=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.015}{4}}=\sqrt{0.0037}\\\\\\s=0.061

The mean and standard deviation for sample 2 are:

M=\dfrac{1}{4}\sum_{i=1}^{4}(0.382+0.276+0.57+0.366)\\\\\\ M=\dfrac{1.594}{4}=0.4

s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{(n-1)}\sum_{i=1}^{4}(x_i-M)^2}\\\\\\s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{3}\cdot [(0.382-(0.4))^2+(0.276-(0.4))^2+(0.57-(0.4))^2+(0.366-(0.4))^2]}\\\\\\            s=\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{3}\cdot [(0)+(0.015)+(0.029)+(0.001)]}\\\\\\            s=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.046}{3}}=\sqrt{0.015}\\\\\\s=0.123

<u>Confidence interval</u>

We have to calculate a 95% confidence interval for the difference between means.

The sample 1, of size n1=5 has a mean of 0.63 and a standard deviation of 0.061.

The sample 2, of size n2=4 has a mean of 0.4 and a standard deviation of 0.123.

The difference between sample means is Md=0.23.

M_d=M_1-M_2=0.63-0.4=0.23

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

s_{M_d}=\sqrt{\dfrac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1}+\dfrac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.061^2}{5}+\dfrac{0.123^2}{4}}\\\\\\s_{M_d}=\sqrt{0.001+0.004}=\sqrt{0.005}=0.07

The critical t-value for a 95% confidence interval is t=2.365.

The margin of error (MOE) can be calculated as:

MOE=t\cdot s_{M_d}=2.365 \cdot 0.07=0.159

Then, the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval are:

LL=M_d-t \cdot s_{M_d} = 0.23-0.159=0.071\\\\UL=M_d+t \cdot s_{M_d} = 0.23+0.159=0.389

The 95% confidence interval for the difference between means is (0.071, 0.389).

<u>Hypothesis test</u>

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between populations means.

The claim is that the fish in this particular polluted lake have signficantly elevated mercury levels.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

H_0: \mu_1-\mu_2=0\\\\H_a:\mu_1-\mu_2> 0

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1, of size n1=5 has a mean of 0.63 and a standard deviation of 0.061.

The sample 2, of size n2=4 has a mean of 0.4 and a standard deviation of 0.123.

The difference between sample means is Md=0.23.

M_d=M_1-M_2=0.63-0.4=0.23

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

s_{M_d}=\sqrt{\dfrac{\sigma_1^2}{n_1}+\dfrac{\sigma_2^2}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.061^2}{5}+\dfrac{0.123^2}{4}}\\\\\\s_{M_d}=\sqrt{0.001+0.004}=\sqrt{0.005}=0.07

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

t=\dfrac{M_d-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_{M_d}}=\dfrac{0.23-0}{0.07}=\dfrac{0.23}{0.07}=3.42

The degrees of freedom for this test are:

df=n_1+n_2-1=5+4-2=7

This test is a right-tailed test, with 7 degrees of freedom and t=3.42, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

\text{P-value}=P(t>3.42)=0.006

As the P-value (0.006) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the fish in this particular polluted lake have signficantly elevated mercury levels.

<u> </u>

c. They agree. Both conclude that the levels of mercury are significnatly higher compared to a unpolluted lake.

In the case of the confidence interval, we reach this conclusion because the lower bound is greater than 0. This indicates that, with more than 95% confidence, we can tell that the difference in mercury levels is positive.

In the case of the hypothesis test, we conclude that because the P-value indicates there is a little chance we get that samples if there is no significant difference between the mercury levels. This indicates that the values of mercury in the polluted lake are significantly higher than the unpolluted lake.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the relationship between 9.125×10−3 and 9.125×102?
gavmur [86]

Answer:

100,000 then its less

good luck

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • to qualify as a contestant in a race, a runner has to be in the top 16% of all entrants. The running times are normally distribu
    8·1 answer
  • What is number 3??????????????????
    9·2 answers
  • lola travelled to new york to visit her grandmother. when she arrived at the airport she discovered that she would need to take
    14·1 answer
  • What is the opposite of the opposite of a negative?
    5·1 answer
  • (2⁵ + 14 ÷ 2) • 2 pls help ;-;
    13·1 answer
  • Jill says he did it wrong. He should have multiplied the bottom first (3 x 5) and then multiplied by the height. Explain to Jill
    14·1 answer
  • Middle school algebra 1
    15·1 answer
  • Evaluate the<br> expression below when<br> a= -5 and b= 2<br> 0.5a - 2b
    8·1 answer
  • Please help me with this problem please?
    15·2 answers
  • Number 4 is 10x24.9<br><br><br> Help me plz and PLZ NO LINKS
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!