What would be some advantages that unitary and confederate governments have over a federalist governments

1 answer:

6 0

<span>
Unitary government controls weaker states in which the power is not shared between states or province, the advantage is that they have uniform laws throughout the country and having orderliness and stability. While the Confederate government is a federation of independent states where the advantage is that it prevents the growth of a large central government by keeping the power at local levels making the several states cooperate regarding common concern. The federal government’s power, unlike the unitary and confederate government, was divided between central and local government where they have their own set of rules, and officials.<span>
</span></span>

You might be interested in

How did the Dawes act have good intentions? And how did it ultimately impact the Native Americans?

bogdanovich [222]

Answer: The Dawes Act of 1887 authorized the federal government to break up tribal lands by partitioning them into individual plots. ... The objective of the Dawes Act was to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US society by annihilating their cultural and social traditions.

5 0

3 years ago

Which of the following are considered customs and traditions of the United States government even though they are not formally m

hjlf

Answer:

I did the test and got a 100%

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Why should the 13 amendment be passed?

leva [86]

Answer:

Explanation:

The move was largely symbolic, as it only freed slaves in areas outside of Union control, but it changed the conflict from a war for the reunification of the states to a war whose objectives included the destruction of slavery. Lincoln believed that a constitutional amendment was necessary to ensure the end of slavery.

7 0

3 years ago

What does ''no taxation without representation'' mean?

RideAnS [48]

The phrase was used when American colonists were being taxed. They were not allowed to choose a representative for the parliament in London, where they passed the laws for taxes.

6 0

4 years ago

6) Close Reading: According to Miantonomo, what should his audience do in retaliation

Sliva [168]

Options are not given in the question, so the complete question is as follows:

According to Miantonomo, what should his audience do in retaliation against the colonists?

A. To unify all together

B. To sacrifice their lives

C. To help save their Tribe.

Answer:

A. To unify all together

Explanation:

Miantonomo was a chief of the Narragansett people in New England and lead the Narragansett tribe in the conflict between the Pequot tribe and the colonists that happened in 1636 and 1638.

Miantonomo should have asked his audience to unify all together in retaliation against the colonists because he believed that together they can defeat the colonist otherwise no Narragansets will be left. In his speech as well Miantonomo tried to unify all Indians by saying that they have to be together like English otherwise they all shall be gone shortly.

Hence, the correct answer is "A. To unify all together".

5 0

3 years ago