A its a great structure for a kid to socialize with another person it helps with future businesses or being able to communicate better
The said friend will likely advise and persuade her best friend to do the thing that she does want. The friend will either support or oppose to the idea generated and confided to her by her best friend. Or this friend might advise and comfort her best friend because of the situation she's in. Laels' best friend might convince her to talk to Lael's husband for she and her husband might lack "communication". Convince means <span>to cause someone to believe something or to do something.</span>
Answer: Option(b) is correct
Explanation:
According to the concept of Malthus and Marx , they had different opinions and ideas for source of poverty , misery, overpopulation and other social aspect in society. Malthus believed that poverty and low food supply, hunger are caused by overpopulation and Marx stated that these situations are result of capitalist economy.
Other options are incorrect because theories generation by combining, didn't have similar beliefs and did not concern severeness in issue of overpopulation, social poverty etc.Thus, the correct option is option(b).
United Kingdom is surrounded with bodies of water; thus, it is easier for them to trade with people from different countries all over the world. Ships carrying various goods from different parts of the world would dock in UK ports and trade their goods for the goods found in UK. People living in UK has livelihoods that are depended on land (farming) and water (fishing).
Since UK is surrounded by bodies of water, it enjoys a milder climate compared with Russia.
Russia, on the otherhand, occupies some parts of Europe and Asia. But, Russians can not maximize the use of their land area since there are parts of Russia wherein there are permanently frozen land. Russia is also bordered by 15 countries with no access to waterways, making trading difficult but possible.
Most Russians live in the European part of the country because it has a better weather condition and trade among neighbouring countries can easily be done.
Abstract
The distribution of wealth in the world is manifested by the polarization of a rich North and a poor South. Is the North-South conflict increasing or decreasing, and does it depend on such variables as major power conflict, intra-Northern conflict, and world prosperity, as some schools of thought maintain? Focusing on these questions from a leadership-long cycle perspective suggests several hypotheses about the interrelationships between global economic growth, Northern antagonism, and North-South conflict. The effect of conflict on growth is also examined. Generating data on world economic growth and major power conflict, intra-Northern conflict, and North-South conflict for the period from 1870 to 1992, vector auto-regression analysis is used to test new hypotheses. Results provide considerable support for the new hypotheses, provide mixed support for the previous arguments, and show that the relationship between world economic growth and conflict is not the same before and after World War II.
