Answer:
yes
Explanation:
I do not know just need points help
The disaster recovery planning team will be responsible for creating the disaster recovery plan and will likely be responsible for testing it and keeping up with its ongoing maintenance.
The disaster recovery team is responsible for creating the organization's disaster recovery plan, developing the planning processes and procedures, and implementing the plan to ensure data recovery in the event of a disaster.
Security administrator. network administrator. Executive Response: An organization's executives are ultimately responsible for corporate governance, including deciding whether to implement BCP/DRP controls.
The role of the Local Disaster Recovery Manager is to organize, coordinate and facilitate recovery at the local level. The experience and skills of these individuals should include a strong foundation for community development and a good knowledge of community demographics.
Learn more about disaster recovery at
brainly.com/question/2916834
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is A) the role of the government should be limited, since the market will always be self-correcting.
Explanation:
Principle of minimum state intervention, free market or laissez faire: at least government, the best, economic processes were considered as capable of self-regulation, in other words, economic forces themselves will direct production, exchange and consumption to Its most efficient level. State action must be confined to enforcing individual rights (especially property rights), providing national defense and some public services of general interest (justice, some types of education, etc.).
Answer:
Explanation:
I will give a basic hint to understanding this problem
Prevailing technique or what is best known as "Dominant Strategy" is an activity profile that is best for a specific player review of what different players are picking. for this situation there is no prevailing procedure for any player on the grounds that there is no single activity profile that expands the result for any player.
So we can say from this observations that the following is valid;
- A doesn't have a dominant strategy
- B doesn't have a dominant strategy
There are two Nash equilibria for this situation. Both the organizations are charging a low cost and both the organizations are charging a significant expense.
As such they can augment their benefit given what the adversary is doing.
I hope this explains the observation seen.
cheers I hope this helps
