Miranda v. Arizona (1966) ruled that individuals must be informed of their legal rights before

History

2 answers:

ad-work [718]4 years ago

6 0

they go before a judge

Hope this helps :D

Nataliya [291]4 years ago

5 0

The best phrase for the statement is "being questioned". Miranda v. Arizona (1966) ruled that individuals must be informed of their legal rights before being questioned. It was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court. This has made a very important impact on the enforcement of the law in the US, where the police has a routine procedure to make the suspects be aware of their rights.

You might be interested in

Someone help please.

tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

1830-1860. Have a nice day :-)

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

What is the goal for confucianism, Daoism,and legalism

Nadya [2.5K]

Answer:Confucianism is an ethic of moral uprightness, social order, and filial responsibility. Daoism was a philosophy of universal harmony that urged its practitioners not to get too involved in worldly affairs. Legalism is a theory of autocratic, centralized rule and harsh penalties.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Please help 30 points

balu736 [363]

Answer: That would be Unitary as all it is defined by all state powers is centralized and controlled by the central government

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Which characteristic suggests that this is a modernist painting?

Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Choose a group of people to research: Batek of Malaysia Romani of Europe Hadza of Tanzania Inuit of North America Find the answe

Lynna [10]

Answer:

wobble wobble mib bim bad bum noom hehe joojooaj huqb ci espa la vrasta exquoazo

Explanation:

espaneo

7 0

3 years ago