Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Sarah has $55
Her expenses are 3 shirts priced at $m each.
Total cost of 3 shirts at $m each would be the multiplication of each:
3 * m = 3m
The amount of money Sarah has left would be the total she had MINUS what she spent on 3 shirts. That would be:
Remaining Money = 55 - 3m
Answer:
<u>Commutative property:</u> states that the order in which we multiply numbers does not change the product.
<u>Associative property:</u> states that you can add or multiply regardless of how the numbers are grouped (aka parenthesis).
<u />
Answer:
-2.35
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: it seems to be D, but the equation makes practically no sense!
The value of the factor changes for the different amounts of service years and vacation weeks.
Step-by-step explanation: The equation means that the employee is trying to figure out the value of the "v-factor" for how vacation time is earned.
If you substitute the number of service years into the left side of the "formula" and vacation weeks on the right side, then solve for "v", v(15)=5 you get v= 1/3 or 0.33
If you substitute other numbers, like v(2)=2, so v= 1 then v(30) = 8, v = 4/15 or 0.2667. You see the factor's value decreases. The company is much more generous to to employees with one or two years of service than with the older ones.
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
you put answer in end
