Answer:
$2,300
Explanation:
Assuming that the requirements for qualified plan awards are otherwise satisfied, each award by itself would be excluded from income.
The excludable amount or deduction is $1,600 out of total amount of awards.
Total amount of awards = Design + Graphic + Employee of the year
= $1,340 + $1,775 + $785
= $3,900
Taxable awards = Total amount of awards – Excludable amount
= $3,900 – $1,600
= $2,300
However, because the $3,900 total value of the awards is more than $1,600, Keren must include $2,300 in his taxable income.
Answer:
E. $40.68
Explanation:
The computation of the stock worth today is shown below:
= (Dividend in year 1 ÷ 1 + required rate of return^number of years ) + (Dividend in year 2 ÷ 1 + required rate of return^number of years) + (Dividend in year 3 ÷ 1 + required rate of return^number of years) + (Dividend in year 3 ÷ 1 + required rate of return^number of years) × (1 + growth rate) ÷ (required rate of return - growth rate)
= $1.2 ÷ 1.14 + $1.5 ÷ 1.14^2 + $2 ÷ 1.14^3 + $2 ÷ 1.14^3 × (1 + 10%) ÷ (14%-10%)
= $40.68
We simply applied the above formula
Answer: Joint operating agreement
Explanation:
The joint operating agreement is one of the concept that helps in protecting the business or the industry from the failure that helps in governing the partnership between any two organization.
In this type of agreement any two organization are basically contributing their power and the resources for producing the effective result.
According to the given question, the newspaper industry is one of the example of joint operating agreement in which two companies are permitted for combining their business. Therefore, Joint operating agreement is the correct answer.
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
