It means that religion will never meddle with running the nation, and it can't figure out who's chosen for specific positions and who isn't. For instance, they can't dismiss qualified possibility for having distinctive religious convictions.
The No Religious Test Clause of the United States Constitution is a proviso inside Article VI, Clause 3. By its plain terms, no administrative officeholder or worker can be required to cling to or acknowledge a specific religion or tenet as an essential to holding a bureaucratic office or a national government work. It promptly pursues a provision requiring all government and state officers to take a pledge or attestation to help the Constitution. This statement contains the main express reference to religion in the first seven articles of the U.S. Constitution.
Nullification is the states'-rights doctrine that a state can refuse to recognize or to enforce a federal law passed by the United States Congress.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
Aphasia is the condition in which a person faces difficulty in understanding words spoken by others and finds it difficult to speak also. It is a type of communication disability disorder.
<u>Wernicke’s Aphasia is the disorder caused due to some damage in the left middle side of the brain. The left middle side of the brain is called the Wernicke area, named after the neurologist, Carl Wernicke. </u>
Some symptoms of Wernicke’s Aphasia are:
- making sentences that don't make sense.
- difficulty in repeating words or phrases.
<u>In the given condition, one must be suffering from Wernicke’s Aphasia. Because the symptoms one is having are of Wernicke’s Aphasia. </u>
So, the correct answer is option A.
Answer:
1. less;
2. implicit;
3. explicit
Explanation:
The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a form of testing or research technique, that seek to measure the level of relationship between concepts and evaluations or stereotype. For example, races and performance.
Also, various research studies, have shown that Implicit Association Test is a better predictor of subsequent behavior than explicit responses.
Hence, in this case, people who reported low levels of prejudice but whose scores on the Implicit Association Test (IAT) indicated negative attitudes about blacks were LESS likely to vote for Obama because IMPLICIT attitudes were better predictors of behavior than EXPLICIT attitudes.
Answer:
Human rights are universal, without any limitation. In contrast, a fundamental right exists within a specific legal system, with the limitations that the law grants. Therefore, the concept of fundamental rights prevails in state laws. A fundamental right is, above all, a right that the constitution creates.
