This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Although the leaders of two enemy nations admit to a buildup of their own military forces, each sees the other country's actions as unreasonable and motivated by evil intentions. This situation best illustrates:
the mere exposure effect.
the just-world phenomenon.
mirror-image perceptions.
deindividuation.
social facilitation.
None of the listed answers are correct
Answer:
This situation best illustrates mirror-image perceptions.
Explanation:
The term mirror-image perception refers to the human tendency of viewing others as the enemy, as evil, especially in a situation of conflict. It is called mirror-image because both people or sides involved in the conflict see themselves as good, and the other as the villain. That is precisely the case described in the passage. Both leaders do not see a problem concerning their own buildup of their military forces - they "know" they are doing it for good reasons. But both of them also think that the other leader doing it is a sign of evil intentions on his part.
Answer:
the end is near
Explanation:
global domination of jews
<span> The fact that both Gerard, who</span><span> stays at home and cares for his two children and Emma</span><span><span>, who is a junior partner at a law firm and works
full-time</span> believe that the roles they have chosen
allow them to put their respective capabilities to optimal use means their
beliefs align with the </span>functionalist perspective.
The functionalist theory of gender inequality suggests that gender inequalities exist as an efficient way to create a division of labor.
