First off, you misspelled some words, second WHICH BUCKET does josh's brother take? That's important!
Step-by-step explanation:
The last step is a little wrong. Lemme show you:
x(x + 2) + (x + 2)
Imagine there is an invisible '1' infront of (x + 2) like this:
= x(x + 2) + 1(x + 2)
Now we can combine the like terms together:
= (x + 1)(x + 2)
This is the correct factorization.
Answer:
a) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean attendance is greater than 642.
Step-by-step explanation:
since in the question it is mentioned that the average attendance at games should be more 642 and according to this he moving the team with a larger stadium. Also the hypothesis conducted and the conclusion would be failure to deny the null hypothesis
So here the conclusion that should be made in non-technical term is that there should be no enough proof in order to support the claim that the mean attendence is more than $642
Answer:
<h2>x = 30°</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
The angle 30° and 2x are complementary angles.
Two angles are called complementary angles, if their sum is one right angle (90°).
Therefore we have the equation:
30 + 2x = 90 <em>subtract 30 from both sides</em>
2x = 60 <em>divide both sides by 2</em>
x = 30
