What is another way to arrange blicks
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer: Choice C.
============================================
Explanation:
The domain is the set of all allowed x inputs.
Here we see that x = -3 is the smallest x value possible as it is from the left-most point. The graph goes on forever to the right, so there is no largest x value. Effectively infinity is the largest x value even though infinity is not a number.
We can say the domain is which can be simplified to
or
In short: x can be -3 or larger.
Answer:
A. (1, -2)
Step-by-step explanation:
We can substitute the variables of x and y into the inequality of .
Let's start with A, -2 being y and 1 being x.
The absolute value of 1 is 1, and negating that gets us -1.
Indeed, -2 is less than -1! So A is a solution to the inequality.
Let's test the rest of them, just in case.
For B:
Absolute value of 1 is 1, negating it is -1.
-1 is EQUAL to -1, not less than it, so is not a solution to the inequality.
Let's try C.
Absolute value of 1 is 1, negating it is -1.
0 is GREATER than -1, so that is not a solution to the inequality.
Hope this helped!
Answer:
a) Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
b)
The degrees of freedom are given by:
The p value for this case taking in count the alternative hypothesis would be:
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
represent the sample mean for the amount spent each shopper
represent the sample standard deviation
sample size
represent the value to verify
t would represent the statistic
represent the p value f
Part a
We want to verify if the shoppers participating in the loyalty program spent more on average than typical shoppers, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic for this case would be given by:
(1)
Replacing the info given we got:
The degrees of freedom are given by:
The p value for this case taking in count the alternative hypothesis would be: