Since Matt has never taken piano lessons but plays like a professional pianist, everyone assumes he acquired the skill through osmosis.
Based on the data provided, we can conclude that the graph in question corresponds to the K-selected theory in regards to the human species.
When considering the data of certain species and grouping them into categories such as extinct, endangered, or K/r-selected we take into account factors such as:
- Population size
- Behavior
- Carrying capacity
- Reproduction rates
and so on, then classify each species accordingly.
Species that are Extinct are no longer on the earth. This classification refers to species of the past and does not include humans as of yet. The endangered category is reserved for species whose population sizes are <u>at a critical low and are near </u><u>extinction</u>, which is also not the case for humans.
The K-selected and r-selected theories consider reproduction rates and carrying capacity as well when grouping species. Species that produce few offspring at a time are often found in this group. This category also refers to species whose offspring have a high chance of survival into maturity and whose population size is near the limit of the environment. All of this follows the data given and is the classification for the human species.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/13046597?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Explanation:
Look I would help but I'm not learning that stuff yet in Middle School.
Answer:
No, they are not. The concept of human races appears to be solidly grounded in present-day biology and our evolutionary history. But if you asked that conference of geneticists to give you a genetic definition of race, they wouldn’t be able to do it. Human races are not natural genetic groups; they are socially constructed categories. Genes certainly reflect geography, but unlike geography, human genetic differences don't fall along obvious natural boundaries that might define races.
