Answer:
formed a valid contract because Rachel's outward expressions showed the formation of a contract.
Explanation:
In contract, outward expressions refers to a situation when both parties has directly communicate the terms of a certain transaction and agreed upon it.
The contract is considered as 'valid' and considered to be a verbal agreement as soon as Rachel proposed a price and Julius agreed upon it.
One thing to remember, Even though this contract is considered as valid , it would be hard for Julius to held Rachel accountable to court since he has no way to proof that the verbal agreement has been made.
Answer:
$2,433
Explanation:
Net Income = Sales - Expenses
where,
Sales = $3,033
and
Expenses = $600
therefore,
Net Income = $3,033 - $600 = $2,433
Two dams, not including the two dams placemarked in the dams folder, impound the colorado river between glen canyon and lake havasu.
Humans build dams to control water—to make sure the right quantity is on the right region on the right time. River water rises in the back of dams, forming artificial lakes referred to as reservoirs. The saved water may be used to generate electricity or to deliver water for houses and industries, for irrigation or for navigation.
The cause of a dam is to impound (keep) water, wastewater or liquid borne materials for any of numerous motives, which includes flood control, human water deliver, irrigation, livestock water supply, energy technology, containment of mine tailings, pastime, or pollutants manage.
A dam is a structure constructed throughout a river or circulate to keep lower back water. humans have used one of a kind substances to build dams over the centuries.
Learn more about dams here
brainly.com/question/17294627
#SPJ4
Credit CARD Act
↓
Protects consumers from unfair credit card billing practices.
Patriot Act
↓
Prevents, detects, and prosecutes international money laundering
Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act
↓
Criminalizes identity theft
Dodd-Frank Act
↓
Educates consumers so that they can protect themselves from unfair practices.
My recommendation would be: communicate directly to the supervisor to clarify the intend of the email
Most employees believed that asking clarification to their supervisor would reflect badly on them since it make them look incompetent.
But most supervisors are trained to provide employees with guidance if they do not understand their assignment. And, following the wrong order would be significantly worse compared to not able to understand an email.
