Answer
Freedom of Expression
Explanation
The first amendment entails five freedoms which are the freedom to religion,freedom to speech, freedom to press, freedom to assembly and freedom to petition.The collective of these freedoms is known as Freedom of Expression.
Freedom of expression is having the power to express ones opinion without any restraint or legal penalty.Freedom of expression is a fundamental human right because it helps people to speak their mind freely regarding to to the important issues in the society.
Answer:
The first and foremost function of a legislature is to legislate i.e. to make laws. In ancient times, laws used to be either derived from customs, traditions and religious scriptures, or were issued by the kings as their commands. However, in the contemporary era of democracy, legislature is the chief source of law.
Explanation:
Hope it is helpful....
A consequentialist approach to ethics is an approach that claims that the morality of an action depends on its outcome. This means that an action is "good" is the consequence it brings is good as well. An example of such a theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that an action is morally good if it leads to the most happiness for greatest number of people. However, an objection that can be made to this theory is that utility and happiness are subjective, as well as difficult to measure.
On the other hand, non-consequentialist ethics state that the morality of an action is based on the rightness and wrongness of the actions themselves and not the consequences of those actions. An example of this is the Natural Rights Theory, which states that humans have an inherent right to certain rights, regardless of human behaviour. However, it is unclear who has the right to state what these rights are, which has led to criticism of the theory.
As part of their settlement of Manhattan, the Dutch purportedly purchased the island from the Native Americans for trade goods worth 60 guilders. More than two centuries later, using then-current exchange rates, a U.S. historian calculated that amount as $24, and the number stuck in the public’s mind. Yet it’s not as if the Dutch handed over a “$20 bill and four ones,” explained Charles T. Gehring, director of the New Netherland Research Center at the New York State Library. “It’s a totally inaccurate figure.” He pointed out that the trade goods, such as iron kettles and axes, were invaluable to the Native Americans since they couldn’t produce those things themselves. Moreover, the Native Americans had a completely different concept of land ownership. As a result, they almost certainly believed they were renting out Manhattan for temporary use, not giving it away forever. Due in part to such cultural misunderstandings, the Dutch repeatedly found themselves at odds with various Native American tribes, most notably in the brutal Kieft’s War of the 1640s. “The Dutch were instructed by their authorities to be fair and honest with the Indians,” said Firth Haring Fabend, author of “New Netherland in a Nutshell.” “But you can’t say they were much better [than the other European nations colonizing the Americas.] They were all terrible.”
Good Luck!
The correct answer is C) Free Trade.
<em>Compared to protectionism an opposing goal of economic foreign policy is free trade.
</em>
Free trade is the opposite of protectionism. Free trade welcomes the exchange of products and services among countries, eliminating or reducing the imports and exports tariffs, and eliminating special tariffs to the products.
The best example of Free Trade in the world is the Free Trade Agreement between Mexico, Canada, and the United States. This free trade agreement has helped the three countries to create more jobs and to improve their economies.
