Answer:
There are advantages and disadvantages to both recruitment methods. Traditional recruitment is still the most common method of recruitment used in the world, due to its simplicity and greater speed in attracting candidates through advertisements, references and internal hiring, for example, which consequently speeds up the selection process, but this type of recruitment can lead to biased evaluations of candidates and not hiring employees based on some kind of prejudice.
In blind recruitment, however, it is not possible to identify details of curriculum and candidates, the selection is made through factors such as experience and skills of the candidate, which eliminates associated prejudices such as age, gender and ethnicity. But the disadvantage of blind recruitment is that it can reduce organizational diversity and miss details that align the candidate's values to organizational culture.
Therefore, it is necessary for each company to analyze which recruitment methods will be more advantageous according to the position, with traditional recruitment being more relevant for hiring professionals for higher hierarchical positions, where there is a need for a more in-depth analysis.
A. Adam Smith, Father of Modern Economics," believed that competition is a regulatory force. He argues that keeps self-interest at bay by restraining the ability to take advantage of consumers.
B. Friedrich Von Hayek, often called F.A. Hayek, believed that less government intervention gives people more economic freedom. He wrote about it in his pamphlet, "Economic Freedom and Representative Government."
C. John Maynard Keyness, according to Keynesian economics, one of the tenets of this school of thought is that government intervention is necessary for stability.
D. Milton Friedman (not Friedrich), said that the government's role in the role should be restricted. The government should not control the money supply.
Answer:
the resources consumed in production
Explanation: answer for ed2020
Answer:
D. 10.0%
Explanation:
As the bank reqiresd 10% compensating balance the actual amount unrestricted for the loan is 48,000 x (1 - 10%) = 43,200
and from this amount we have to solve for the effective rate:
principal x rate = interest
48,000 x 0.09 = 4,320
now we divide the interest over the actual principal to know the effective rate:
4,320 / 43,200 = 0.10 = 10%
Answer:
The answer is D - mostly by producers but partially by consumers.
Explanation:
Tax incidence depends on the relative price elasticity of demand and supply. When supply is more elastic than demand, buyers bear most of the tax burden but when demand is more elastic than supply, producers bear most of the cost of tax and consumers bear less.
