Answer:
Line 3 is incorrect; we don't know anything about the lengths of HG, FG, HE, and EF, so this line is not valid based on the given information.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the Noah's poof of the construction, segment EG would divide angle FGH into two equal parts, which makes line 2 to be valid. i.e <EGH ≅ <EGF. And it can also be observed that line 4 is a valid theorem in proving the congruent nature of triangles.
But line 3 is not valid because of the condition of the statement. Furthermore, segments FG, EG, HG, HE and FE may not be congruent. Thus, the condition of the statement in line 3 is incorrect.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Substitution method can be applied in four steps.
Solve one of the equations for either x = or y = .
Substitute the solution from step 1 into the other equation.
Solve this new equation.
Solve for the second variable. ...
Step 1: Solve one of the equations for either x = or y =
Yes, because the mixed numbers could be a negative number like -1 1/2 plus -2 1/2 which would be -4 and -4 is less than one.
put 'm's one side and numbers the other side
