All categories

3 years ago

If caviar prices doubled, while sales of caviar rose 20%, this example would definitely refute the law of demand. A. TrueB.False

Business

1 answer:

CaHeK987 [17]3 years ago

3 0

Answer: False

Explanation:

The law of demand says that if the price of a commodity increases then its quantity demanded decreases and vice versa. In this question, the price is increase and the sales are also increasing, if all the other factors are constant then this is definitely refuting the law of demand but as the information about other factors is not given, we can not say that this example is definitely refuting the law of demand.

You might be interested in

Natalie owns a condominium near Cocoa Beach in Florida. This year, she incurs the following expenses in connection with her cond

kumpel [21]

Answer and Explanation:

Natalie's Gross Income = $10,000

75 + 35 = 110 days

Expenses:

Insurance Expense (75/110) x 1000 682

Advertising Expense 500

Mortgage Interest (75/110) x 3500 2386

Property Taxes (75/110) x 900 614

Repairs and Maintenance (75/110) x 650 443

Utilities (75/110) x 950 648

Depreciation (75/110) x 8500 5795

Until the depreciation expenses the total expenses accumulate to 5273. If we deduct that with the gross income total we get 4727. We can only deduct 4727 from the total portion of 5795 depreciation expense.

Therefore, for AGI deductions we take total of (5273 + 4727) = $10,000

For Natalie's personal deduction of AGI

Mortgage interest (35/110) x 3500 1114

Property taxes (35/110) x 900 286

Total personal deduction for AGI $1400

4 0

3 years ago

_______________is concerned with what is, and ▼ positive analysis neutral analysis normative analysis is concerned with what ou

EastWind [94]

Answer:

The correct answer is normative analysis.

Explanation:

A positive analysis is the one that attempts to reflect reality with statements of cause and effect and is used mainly in microeconomics. On the other hand, a normative analysis, in which reality is prescribed, that is, we go beyond explanation and prediction, value judgments are used.

In contrast to the positive analysis, the normative analysis responds how the law should achieve efficiency objectives. This analysis assumes that efficiency is an objective that law should reflect and that legal norms should change when they fail. From this perspective, efficiency is a social value that the Law should promote.

3 0

3 years ago

Colin told the management team that their Ohio-based company should produce the textiles for the new line of jackets in China be

ELEN [110]

Answer:

Free trade.

Explanation:

This theoretical policy can be explained to be certain laws under which the government is seen to impose absolutely no tariffs, taxes, or duties on imports, or quotas on exports. Therefore, it is directly seen to be the opposite of protectionism, a defensive trade policy intended to eliminate the possibility of foreign competition. It is seen in terms of unrestricted measures in importation and also exportation of goods in and out of a country.

In the world of our own, which is of the recent times, this policy implementation is done by means of a formal and mutual agreement of the nations which are seen to be involved. Also this policy in some cases may simply be the absence of any trade restrictions.

7 0

3 years ago

In macroland potential gdp equals $20 billion and real gdp equals $19.2 billion. macroland has a(n) ______ gap equal to ______ p

Jet001 [13]

Potential GDP = $20
Real GDP =$19.2
so an output gap is measured relative to potential output and it is calculated according to the formula [( X - Y ) Ă· Y] Ă—100. In this case, the output gap is [($10 billion - $8 billion) Ă· $8 billion] Ă—100 = 25%.

6 0

3 years ago

Sweet Company’s outstanding stock consists of 1,000 shares of noncumulative 5% preferred stock with a $100 par value and 10,000

frutty [35]

Answer:

preferred stockholders received $15,000 during the first 3 years

$2,000 in the first year
$6,000 in the second year
$7,000 in the third year

common shareholders received $25,000 in dividends during the third year.

Explanation:

preferred stock = 1,000 shares x $100 par value x 5% = $5,000

common stock = 10,000 shares at $10 par value

dividends declared and paid during the first 3 years:

year dividends

1 $2,000

2 $6,000

3 $32,000

preferred stockholders should have received $5,000 per year x 3 years = $15,000. Preferred stockholders must be paid first, and their payment is fixed. If the dividends are not enough to pay the total amount, the remaining amount should be paid next year.

$2,000 in the first year
$6,000 in the second year
$7,000 in the third year

common shareholders received $32,000 - $7,000 = $25,000 in dividends during the third year.

7 0

3 years ago