1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ira Lisetskai [31]
3 years ago
15

The equation below represents the trend line of a scatter plot showing the hours spent studying versus science test scores.

Mathematics
2 answers:
Fofino [41]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

on the science test because the y-intercept is greater

Step-by-step explanation:

Just cause

navik [9.2K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

On the science test  the point  ( 0 , 424 ) the intercepts is bigger

Step-by-step explanation:

The relation hours spend vs science test score is

y  =  6.5*x  + 424

And the relation hours spend vs Maths test score is

y  =  7.2*x   + 34.7

Making   x =  0  ( student does not study at all ) we get:

For science score test woul be

y  =  0  + 424

In case of maths

y  =  0  + 34.7

That mean student without studying will get better score in science.

The point  ( 0 , 424)   ( science ) represents the interception with y axis

in Maths case such point is  ( 0 . 34.7)

You might be interested in
Three numbers add up to 180. The second number is twice the first, and the third number is three times the first. WHAT IS EACH N
Ratling [72]
The answer is 30,60,90. Because 60 is twice the number 30 and 90 is three times the first number.
8 0
3 years ago
Help me in number 3!!!
Alecsey [184]
Answer: G

Explanation/Calculation:

You can clearly see that the white shapes are positive while the black shapes are negative. You can determine this because all (except F) claim that the 6 shapes are negative.

To make it easier, use elimination. It's definitely not J because you are not subtracting -6, but adding (as seen in the equation.) It is not F because 2(3)=6 when the equation needs -6.

So it is either G or H...

H claims that 12x+3+(-6) is what the model symbolizes; but this is incorrect. Unless x is a decimal, you can not have the large shape as the "purest" form (so to speak.) The "purest" state you can go in this model is a cube/square which=1.

Therefore, "G Jamey modeled 12 + 3x + (-6) and it is equivalent to 12x-3" is the correct answer.

Hope this helps you!
8 0
3 years ago
Can someone please help me?
JulijaS [17]
I think it would be no because it has the same number 0 in the input and output side which is a big no no
5 0
2 years ago
Can someone help me for this question please? I just keep getting wrong answer! Pls someone explain to me step by step! ASAP!!!
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

  84 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

This problem involves several steps. The first step is to realize that the given figure does not show the required number of vertical stringers. It shows 5, but there will be 7 of them. The given diagram is helpful in that it shows a vertical stringer on the centerline of the arches.

The second step is to write a function that will tell you how long the stringer will be. I find it convenient to write the equation for an arch shape such as this using the parent function h(x) = 1-x^2. This parent function gives an arch of height 1 and width 1 from center (a total width of 2). You want an arch that is 16 ft high and 40 ft wide (one side from center), so you must scale this parent function both horizontally (by 40) and vertically (by 16). It becomes ...

  H(x) = 16(1 -(x/40)^2)

The taller arch is twice this height, so the length of a vertical stringer at position x is

  vertical length = 2H(x) -H(x) = H(x)

That is, the function H(x) we defined can be used to find the length of the stringers.

The third step is to find the stringer lengths. It can save some energy if you realize that the problem is symmetrical, so that the stringer at x=-30 is the same length as the one at x=30. We need to find stringer lengths every 10 feet from -40 feet to +40 feet. Of course, the ones at ±40 feet are zero length, because that is where the two arches meet.

  H(-30) = 16(1 -(3/4)^2) = 7

  H(-20) = 16(1 -(1/2)^2) = 12

  H(-10) = 16(1 -(1/4)^2) = 15

  H(0) = 16

Then the fourth step is to add up the stringer lengths, rounding the result as required.

  7 +12 +15 +16 +15 +12 +7 = 16 + 2(34) = 84 . . . . feet (no rounding needed)

Finally, you need to answer the question asked:

  The sum of vertical stringer lengths is 84 feet.

5 0
3 years ago
Can u help me with this
pishuonlain [190]
The answer is 10.62 meters. All you have to do is add them together to get the answer. I hope you find this answer the most helpful! :)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Janine’s credit card wasn’t stolen, and the thief charged a $44 meal before she reported it stolen. how much of this is Janine r
    12·1 answer
  • Rachel sells internet subscriptions by telephone. She receives 12% of the first $800 and 16% on the balance over $800. Last mont
    5·2 answers
  • Evaluate this expression. Choose the best answer. 9! A. 5,040 B. 362,880 C. 326,880 D. 40,320
    15·2 answers
  • Select the expression that is equivalent to (picture)
    9·1 answer
  • A customer buys 17.01 in gas and requests one five dollar [$5] lottery ticket, two one dollar [$1] lottery tickets, and one [$3]
    10·1 answer
  • Help quickly please
    12·2 answers
  • Jerry leaves home driving at 50 miles per hour. Ten minutes later, Jenny drives after him at the speed 65 miles per hour. When w
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a good strategy to solve this problem?
    9·2 answers
  • Joanne cannot decide which of two washing machines to buy. The selling price of each is ​$480 The first is marked down by ​%50 T
    12·2 answers
  • If P dollars are invested today at an annual interest rater compounded once a year, then the value of the account A after 2 year
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!