A speaker's credibility is affected by two primary factors-competence and character.
<h3>What is
factors-competence?</h3>
Following on from the preceding explanation, three elements influence students' competence, which will be investigated further. Teachers' instructional performance, students' learning satisfaction, and accomplishment motivation are among these aspects.
Competence is defined as your talent or aptitude in a particular field or subject, or being able to perform something well or being sane enough to face trial in court. A pianist's ability to play the piano skillfully is an example of competence.
Affective social competency is defined as effective communication of one's own affect, successful understanding and response to others' affective communications, and awareness, acceptance, and regulation of one's own affect.
To know more about factors-competence follow the link:
brainly.com/question/2014737
#SPJ4
Answer:
B
Explanation:
because there immigrants move to different places once
Answer:
. c the Union controlled the Mississippi.
Explanation:
The battle of Vicksburg which was started on 18th May 1863 and lasted till 4 July of the same year is one deciding battles of the Civil War of the United States. Union Major General S.Grant and his Army Of Tennessee crossed the Mississippi and put the Confederates Army into a defensive line. He charged two assaults on the fortress of Vicksburg but with little success and then he decided to besiege the fortress of Vicksburg. the confederate army ran out of supplies and surrendered after forty days. The defeat resulted in weakening the war efforts of Confederates and Mississippi was controlled by the Union.
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
Answer:
It make it possible for Americans to win despite having disadvantage on their weapons.
Explanation:
During the revolution, The British was in a massive advantage over Americans because of their more advanced military equipment. But the British do not know the battleground terrain's as well as Americans do.
So. the Americans Adopted a guerrilla warfare.
The Guerrilla tactic is conducted by hiding from the enemies in the terrain and attack them when they lower their guard.This tactic nullified the disadvantage in weapons and make it possible for Americans to won the war.
