Voting rights is not apart of the first amendment
i would select it allows citizens to choose who will run the government
why? - the whole point of the US voting system is so we do not have dictatorship and so the people of our country can decide who they would like to be in power and make decisions for the better of the people
Governments are more justified to censoring war news because:
· The Government know that everyone has a self-inflicted opinion on to which every right they have. So if they were to show such war news, citizens of different opinion on the matter at hand would argue and bicker over what is right in their own state of mind and in turn this situation could bring up riots and up risings and possible soil attacks made by the countries own people.
I hope this was able to help you, have a nice day. :)
Frances, like most people in her culture, avoids making eye contact with strangers. A conventionalist would call the action of making eye contact with strangers <u>impermissible.</u>
Conventionalists adhere to a belief that the principles and values, moral rules, social expectations and etiquette, are a creation of human society and therefore not immutable or universal; rather, they are specific to a particular culture.
For example, the prohibition against murder or stealing are not universal laws, applicable to all societies, but are created over time through agreements -implicit or explicit- between members of society.
Where making eye contact with strangers is against the norm, a conventionalist would argue that it is impermissible to commit that particular action.
To learn more about conventionalists: brainly.com/question/24316302
#SPJ4
Answer:
Deafness is no longer seen as an obstacle, but as an important feature that affects the individual's ability to live independently, while still continuing to be labeled as disability. An important role is played by the study of the lives of people with disabilities, their personal growth, employment, the search for ways to overcome isolation and stimulate independence. At the same time, the definition of the deaf as “disabled” and their study together with the blindness, people with disorders of the musculoskeletal system, mental disorders, etc. often led to ignoring the cultural and linguistic specifics of this group.
The cultural model of disability, as a rule, is usually attributed to the post-traditional paradigm and determined through the struggle of people with disabilities for their cultural identity in the process of recognizing their own differences from the dominant group. Unlike other categories of people with disabilities, in the case of which “it is rather difficult to answer the question of what is the culture of disability”, researchers of the deaf and hard of hearing even in the middle of the 20th century drew attention to the sign language and culture of the deaf and, therefore, began to interpret deafness not as a disability, but as one of the socio-demographic characteristics of a person.
Adherents of the cultural concept consider the deaf culture as a subculture whose main characteristics are sign language, self-determination, similar behavioral patterns, internal marriages, a common historical heritageб and a network of formal associations and organizations.
At the same time, the first criticism of this approach appeared in scientific discourse, expressing skepticism regarding the existence of an independent phenomenon of the deaf culture. It was noted that the culture of the deaf is only a mirror image of mass culture and exists only as a reaction to the “hearing” one.
Explanation:
