Answer:
wow that's inpressive
Step-by-step explanation:
is this a question?
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
The graph in this case represents exponential decline.
About 224.7 I think. I hope this helps
Answer:
Not proportional.
Step-by-step explanation:
The butterfly method multiples it like a butterfly. Ex. 5 times 3 is 15. 8 times 2 is 16. Therefore, not proportional.
Answer:
There is enough evidence to say that the true average heat output of persons with the syndrmoe differs from the true average heat output of non-sufferers.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to perform a hypothesis test on the difference between means.
The null and alternative hypothesis are:

μ1: mean heat output for subjects with the syndrome.
μ2: mean heat output for non-sufferers.
We will use a significance level of 0.05.
The difference between sample means is:

The standard error is

The t-statistic is

The degrees of freedom are

The critical value for a left tailed test at a significance level of 0.05 and 16 degrees of freedom is t=-1.746.
The t-statistic is below the critical value, so it lies in the rejection region.
The null hypothesis is rejected.
There is enough evidence to say that the true average heat output of persons with the syndrmoe differs from the true average heat output of non-sufferers.