Answer:
d
Explanation:
The complete question is mentioned in attachment. According to 2nd line and 2nd last line, option d is the ocrrect answer.
Answer: indemnification
Explanation: The indemnification clause is essentially the other party's obligation to compensate your damages if they do something that hurts you or allows you to be sued by a third party.
Indemnifying and keeping innocent means the same thing — making it whole after a defeat. Usually, but not always, the obligation to indemnify is reconcilable with the contractual obligation to "keep harmless" or "save harmless.
Hence from the above we can conclude that Rangle has right of indemnification.
Answer:
the correct answer is the option D: neither firm has a dominant strategy
Explanation:
To begin with, if both firms decides to add pizza to their menu then they both will be competing with that new item in the market and therefore that none of them will be dominant due to the fact that both are now producing and selling the good. Moreover, it is not a nash equilibrium due to the fact that it is not stated if the players know the other one strategy and even though that the best strategy to take in order to establish one's dominance is to add pizza to the menu, what happens here is that both take that strategy making it in a situation where both tried their best to improve their situation and ended up using the same strategy.
Trade discounts are offered to customers with high volume
orders in a specified date of payment. In the problem given, the estimated
price of the jacket is $50 but with 40% discount within 10 days of purchase.
Therefore, $50 * 40% = 20. The manufacturer will receive $30 which is the price
less discount.
