The correct answer is "Criterion validity."
The option that determines this relationship is <em>criterion validity.</em>
When using criterion validity, Patagonia tries to assess a potential employee’s capability within the standards of the organization. The managers of the company want to determine how well they predict a potential employee’s actual job performance based on scores on the employee’s selection procedure.
This statistical method -criteria validity- tries to identify how well a measure validates or predicts an outcome of another measure. In a company, the Human Resources Department applies this test to a candidate as part of the interview mechanism to confirm that he/she would be the right candidate for the job.
Answer: Mitigation of damages
Explanation: The concept of Mitigation of damages defines the action an individual or party who has suffered or incurred a loss arising from a breach of contract should take in other to lessen or mitigate the effect of the contract breach. This will lessen or reduce the loss incurred as a result of the breach caused by the other party. Once there is a breach of contract, Mitigation of damages becomes a duty on the party who has suffered a loss and should therefore, prevent increased 'avoidable loss' caused by the contract breach. Further losses incurred has a result of failure to mitigate damages won't be catered for by the party guilty of the breach of contract.
Answer: Correlation versus causation
Explanation:
Correlation is measuring the relationship between two variables, their size or direction, and causation is describing one event as a result of another event so it is showing us a relationship between two events. In this case, aggressive children would be a cause of watching and playing violet games, not games themselves.