It would have to be wind and rain because its is actually better
Answer:
1. 2.8%
2. 97.1%
Explanation:
- If the birth rate of this disorder is 1 in every 5000 births it means that the frequency of the recessive homozygous genotype is 1/5000=0.0002
If we name the gene for the disorder with A, than the genotypes are aa (homozugous recessive), Aa (heterozygous, carrier), AA (dominant homozygous).
According to the Hardy-Weinberg equation:
frequency of AA is p2 (P)
frequency of Aa is 2pq
frequency of aa is q2 (Q) and
p2+2pq+q2=1 (P+Q=1)
Q=0.0002 P=1-0.0002=0.9998
q=
0.0002=0.014
p=
0.9998=0.999
2pq=0.028=2.8%
2. According to the Hardy-Weinberg equation:
frequency of AA is p2 (P)
frequency of Aa is 2pq
frequency of aa is q2 (Q) and
p2+2pq+q2=1 (P+Q=1)
The frequency of the recessive homozygous genotype (Q) is 1/5000=0.0002
Q=0.0002
q2=0.0002 2pq=0.028 p2=?
p2= 1-0.0002-0.028 =0.9718=97.1%
Answer: hematocrit measurements and hemoglobin measurements
Explanation:
This is it.,, the answer you have been waiting for.
The majority of chemist would not find the claim that this form of helium did not release the same number of neutrons as other helium credible because :
The chemists claim is based on conjecture rather than empirical evidence ( B )
The claim made by the chemists is based on conjecture rather than empirical evidence because nuclear fusion is the reaction between two light nuclei to form heavy atomic nucleus ( one or more ) . during the reaction between the nuclei the release or absorption of heat reflects the differences in the masses of the reactants and product. It is not dependent on the amount of neutrons released.
Hence we can conclude that the claim is not credible because the Chemist claim is based on conjecture rather than empirical evidence.
Learn more : brainly.com/question/18545784