1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scoundrel [369]
3 years ago
14

Solve the inequality 3(4-6)+ 2≥2(-t+3)+4

Mathematics
2 answers:
bearhunter [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

I need the work please

Step-by-step explanation:

Papessa [141]3 years ago
3 0
The answer is t ≥ 7
You might be interested in
Please help. <br><br> Correct answer will get brainliest and full ratings.
irina1246 [14]
Hope this helps but I think the answer is A.To find this look at the points on the graph and find out what their ordered pairs are. Once you do that look at the x values for all the ordered pairs.Example the x value for the ordered pair (-3,-1) is -3.After you have found all the x values put them in order from least to greatest.I any x values are repeated then leave them out.Example if your x values are 0,1,1,2,3,3,4 then leave the extra 1 and 3 out and then you have 0,1,2,3,4.Once you have put the x values in order from least to greatest  and left out any extra repeated x values the you are done and you have your domain for the function.
5 0
3 years ago
help me please send me the solutions not only the answer kindly write and. send if possible in my whatsap no. (eight 017000 nine
ryzh [129]

Answer: It will be set: a), e), g)

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to form a triangle then the sum of its angles has to be equal to 180 degrees. In order to find out if it’s possible to form a triangle from a specific set of angles, then you have to add them up and see if they are equal to 180 degrees. If they are then it’s a triangle if they less than or greater than 180 then a triangle cannot he formed.

5 0
3 years ago
Pleaseee ASAP I GIVE 30 pts <br> Calculate the area
Alina [70]

Ans

All equally important without physical health having social health might be harder since you might not be able to interact as well because of illness which would then affect mental. Without mental health your social and physical health would deteriorate and without social health your mental then physical health would deteriorate we need a balanced amount of all of these

All equally important without physical health having social health might be harder since you might not be able to interact as well because of illness which would then affect mental. Without mental health your social and physical health would deteriorate and without social health your mental then physical health would deteriorate we need a balanced amount of all of these

All equally important without physical health having social health might be harder since you might not be able to interact as well because of illness which would then affect mental. Without mental health your social and physical health would deteriorate and without social health your mental then physical health would deteriorate we need a balanced amount of all of these

All equally important without physical health having social health might be harder since you might not be able to interact as well because of illness which would then affect mental. Without mental health your social and physical health would deteriorate and without social health your mental then physical health would deteriorate we need a balanced amount of all of these

All equally important without physical health having social health might be harder since you might not be able to interact as well because of illness which would then affect mental. Without mental health your social and physical health would deteriorate and without social health your mental then physical health would deteriorate we need a balanced amount of all of these

5 0
3 years ago
5. Find the next three terms.<br> 9, 12, 15, 18,...
Olin [163]

Answer:

21,24,27,30

Step-by-step explanation:

hi there are some good times for me and said she would stay

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Four bushels of oats weigh 58 kg How much do 6.5 bushels of oats weigh?
iren2701 [21]

Answer:

x = 94.25 kg

Step-by-step explanation:


We can set up ratios to determine the number of kg.


4 bushels    6.5 bushels

-------- --    = --------------

58 kg              x kg


Using cross products

4 * x  = 58 * 6.5

4x = 377

Divide by 4

x = 94.25 kg

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the volume of the cone to the nearest cubic millimeter? (Use ​π = 3.14)
    13·1 answer
  • If pentagon ABCDE is rotated 180 degrees around the origin to create pentagon A’B’C’D’E’, what is the ordered pair of point A’?
    11·1 answer
  • If 90 is in 80% of value,what is that value
    5·2 answers
  • Solve (x-3)^2=5 please
    10·2 answers
  • (a + b)2 = 1a2 + 2ab + 1b2
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone pls help with this?
    14·1 answer
  • A poll asks shoppers at the mall how many cups of water they typically drink in a day. The results of the poll are listed below.
    8·1 answer
  • Are the expressions -0.5(3x + 5) and<br> -1.5x + 2.5 equivalent? Explain why or why not.
    14·1 answer
  • What is the value of x in the equation 4(2x + 12) = 0? a −8 b −6 c 6 d 8
    11·1 answer
  • Write the phrase as an expression.<br><br> 5 less than 8
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!