Answer:
A, B and D
Explanation:
Man-made disasters can be prevented by applying the options above.
Alarm systems have proven to be very effective in alerting people to potential dangers in their environment whether in the home or workplace. For example, a fire alarm which goes off on the detection of smoke enable people to evacuate a building and the fire department to be called in to contain the situation.
Plans for evacuation and shelter in the event of a disaster cannot be underestimated. For example, the evacuation of people living near and around nuclear reactor sites or chemical plants should be planned for.
Regular inspection by licensed inspectors, of man-made structures goes a long way in helping determine whether those structures are still durable and reliable. For instance, regular inspection of old architectures like buildings and bridges enable us see warning signs about a potential disaster and take steps to stop it.
Implementation of a fail-safe mechanism recognises potential failures in system designs and protects against such failures resulting in a fatality.
Answer:
The answer is
→ <u><em>Phatic communication</em></u>
Explanation:
Phatic communication is a type of communication that lay out a disposition of amiability rather than to convey significant data or thoughts.
Therefore, <u><em>phatic communication</em></u> is your answer!
Hope this helped! :^)
Answer:
C
Explanation:
A projection test is mostly used in clinical settings. Theses test are used to know the qualitative information about the clients.
Protective test has some disadvantages such as:
- These tests do not have standard scales tends to lack both validity and reliability
- Scoring is highly subjective
- The score of the test highly influenced by the subject's attitude and mood.
But some researcher suggested that the projection test such as Rorschach have the supplementary assessment used in conjunction with another diagnostic test that identifies thought disorder and disabilities
Answer:
Women's rights have historically been restricted by the Supreme Court using the reasonableness standard.
Explanation:
The reasonableness standard is used in US courts to understand whether a plaintiff or defendant acted reasonably in a harassment situation, for example, and it has been used in cases against police where the plaintiff claims excessive violence was used. There is also the "reasonable woman standard" that has been used in US Supreme Court Cases like Harris vs. Forklift Systems 510 US 17 (1993). The Supreme Court sided in favor of Harris who had to appeal two lower court decisions that found that Harris was not sufficiently psychologically impacted for the case to constitute harassment. The reasonableness standard can be seen as limiting because it imposes the standards of what men find reasonable in a sexual situation and coworker relationship at the expense of what women may find uncomfortable or inappropriate.
