Answer:
The explanation of the three factors and they conclusion are below.
Explanation:
To begin with, when we talk about experimental units we refer to the entities that the researcher looks forward to make inferences about, so that means that in this case the experimental units of the situation will be all the people who got to visit the website in both schedules, the morning shift and the afternoon shift.
Secondly, the treatments is understood to be the process or the way, it could be said, that the researchers administrate to the experimental units. So that implicates that in this case the treatments will be the morning with its comfort described and the afternoon on the other side with its discounted prices shown.
Finally, the most probable outcomes for this experiments will be that the statics will show how the people interact with the variables and which of them generated more interest, that being either price or comfort. It will also show the behavior of the people when it comes to understand if the tend more to visit the web site at morning or afternoon.
Divide variable costs by output. Therefore, it would be 750000 divided 1200, giving you $625.
Answer:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&$mow grounds&$paint garage&$Differential\\$Revenue&1400&1360&\\$Cost&-160&-80&\\$Net &1240&1280&-40\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26%24mow%20grounds%26%24paint%20garage%26%24Differential%5C%5C%24Revenue%261400%261360%26%5C%5C%24Cost%26-160%26-80%26%5C%5C%24Net%20%261240%261280%26-40%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
It is better to paint the garage this week as provide better relevant yield.
Explanation:
The 1,000 invested in the law mower ware sunk cost as it is already incurred. After this week we will be still be able to take jobs ralated to the lawn mower.
We must base our analysis in the future cost associate with each alternative.
These are the revenue of each job and the additional cost.
The transportation as they are equal to both alternative are disregarded.
(1) c. Offers a negative-sounding apology
(2) c. Fails to offer a clear explanation
Explanation:
At the closing part of the letter, a negative sounding apology can demoralize the employees.
Hubert should have offered a well-informed explanation without sounding negative.
The letter can be re-written as follows:
Date: May 10
To: All Employees
From: Anne Leller Manager, Classic Car Restoration Inc.
Subject: Three Shelby Mustangs
You all have to work overtime next week because we must have the three 1965 Shelby Mustangs ready for Bruce Willis, one of our best clients.
We need to make sure to use all original engine parts and add a top-of-the-line clear coat on all three cars.
Additionally, the client purchased the original radios for each car, so we should install those too.
I apologize for any inconvenience, unfortunately, I am unwilling to make exceptions to this request at this point of time. However, you will surely receive an additional bonus for working overtime along with your salary.
