So, we need to do the distance she travelled (21 miles) divided by the rate at which she travelled (4 hours). Therefore, because 21 divided by 4 is 5.25, she biked at a speed of 5.25 mph (Miles per hour). So, if she bikes 5.25 miles every hour we can divide 42 by 5.25 to get the time it would take her to travel 42 miles. Now, 42 divided by 5.25 equals 8, so that means for Shelly to bike 42 miles at her average speed of 5.25 mph, it would take her 8 hours.
Answer:
Rectangle 1 area: 53 units squared
Shape 2 area: 43.75 units squared
Step-by-step explanation:
Shape 1:
We need to find the area of the two triangles in this rectangle and subtract it from the total area of the rectangle.
Total area of the rectangle:
13 * 5 = 65
Area of triangles (they are congruent):
1/2 * 4 * 3 = 6
6 * 2 = 12
65 - 12 = 53
The area of the shaded part is 53 (I don't know what your unit of measurement is. Just say units.)
Shape 2:
First, let's find the area of the parallelogram at the top.
10 * 3 = 30
Now, let's find the area of the rest of the shape. Triangle first...
1/2 * 4 * 1.5 = 3
Now, the rectangle and the tiny triangle we can section out at the end:
7 * 1.5 = 10.5 + 1/4 (Triangle) or 0.25 = 10.75
Total area: 10.75 + 3 + 30 = 43.75
Answer:
the young and older kids that answer these questions are at least 50.9999999% accurate
Ive always used brainly andit got me to 7th grade so id say YESSSS
Answer:
1. a. Weak
2. r^2=0.0169
The variation in the price of the wine explained by the variation in the weight of the bottle is 1.69%.
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation between the weight of the wine bottles and the price of the wine is r=0.13.
The values for r goes from r=-1, where a perfect negative correlation to r=1 for a perfect positive correlation. The value r=0 indicates no correlation at all.
Then, a value of r close to 0 indicates very weak correlation between the two variables.
The value for r^2 in this case is:
The value of r2 can be interpreted as the proportion of the variation in the dependant variable explained by the independent vairable. In this case, the variation in the price of the wine explained by the variation in the weight of the bottle is 1.69%, which is very close to 0.
