Answer:
$0
Explanation:
Since Alex's child does not live with him for at least 6 months plus one day, he doesn't qualify for any income credit.
Alex himself cannot claim the earned income credit for an individual without a qualifying child because he is just 24 years old, and you must me at least 25 years old to qualify.
Answer:
37.9 days
Explanation:
Given that,
Net sales = $951,000
Beginning accounts receivables = $75,500
Ending accounts receivables = $122,000
Average accounts receivables:
= (Beginning accounts receivables + Ending accounts receivables) ÷ 2
= ($75,500 + $122,000) ÷ 2
= $98,750
Accounts Receivable Turnover:
= Net sales ÷ Average accounts receivables
= $951,000 ÷ $98,750
= 9.63
Average collection period:
= 365 days ÷ Accounts Receivable Turnover
= 365 days ÷ 9.63
= 37.9 days
Answer:
If Jenny doesn’t earn any interest on her savings and wants to perfectly smooth consumption across her life, how much will she consume every year?
Jenny's total income during her life = income as tax analyst ($60,000 x 10) + income as PhD student ($12,000 x 5) + income as Art Director (35 x $95,000) = $3,985,000
she generated income during 50 years and expects to live 20 more, so in order to perfectly smooth consumption across her life, she must divide her total life income by 70 years = $3,985,000 / 70 years = $56,928.57 per year
What might prevent her from perfectly smoothing consumption?
First of all, besides inflation, you also earn interest on your savings. That is why 401k and other retirement accounts work so well (the magic of compound interest). Even if inflation and interests didn't exist, you cannot know exactly what you are going to earn in the future and for how many years. In this case, she earned $60,000 for 10 years, but then earned only $12,000 during 5 years. If she really wanted to smooth her consumption, she would have needed to get a loan because her savings during the first 10 years wouldn't be enough.
Answer:
a. Firm M probably has a higher dividend payout ratio than Firm N.
Explanation:
The dividend payout ratio is commonly referred to a portion of the net income of the company which is paid to the various shareholders in dividends. Therefore, if we consider the statements made in the question, Firm M has a higher annual net income while the annual net income of Firm N is fluctuating, we can conclude that the dividend payout ratio of Firm M is more than that of Firm N.
They dont see the end benefit
Not 100% on this one
