1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kotegsom [21]
3 years ago
7

In 2012, hurricane sandy caused massive destruction to the northeast united states. tens of thousands of people lost their homes

and possessions. even those who weren't directly affected by the destruction were hurt because business failed or contracted and jobs dried up.
Business
1 answer:
Sonja [21]3 years ago
7 0

In this case, the economy had been suffering from a recession leading to lower output, aggregate demand and real GDP. The government can boost the economy by engaging in expansionary fiscal policy.

Government can implement expansionary fiscal policy by increasing government spending on goods and services, which will directly increase aggregate demand, thus boosting income and real GDP. Alternatively the government can lower tax rate. When individual tax rate falls, personal disposable income rises, increasing consumption demand and aggregate demand. When business tax rate falls, corporate net profits rise, which encourages firms to invest more in expanding their output. Higher investment by corporate firms increase aggregate demand.

You might be interested in
Which of these are considered rewards of practicing management? Building a catalog of successful products or services Becoming a
Juliette [100K]

Answer:

The rewards of practicing management include:

a. Building a catalog of successful products or services

b. Becoming a mentor and helping others

c. Experiencing a feeling of accomplishment along with your employees

d. Magnifying your range and stretching your abilities

Explanation:

When management is truly practiced, the rewards are usually great.  The rewards cannot be quantified by what one person has accomplished, because it has some multiplier effects.  Organizational efficiency is also improved.  For those in management, they will gain much experience which they can easily pass to others through mentoring and coaching.  With their employees, they will also feel a sense of having accomplished something meaningful.  Management also gives one the ability to go beyond one's natural range, stretching the person's abilities, and enabling her to attain better outcomes than initially imagined.

3 0
3 years ago
Both Bond Bill and Bond Ted have 6.2 percent coupons, make semiannual payments, and are priced at par value. Bond Bill has 5 yea
iragen [17]

Answer:

a-1. Percentage change in the price of Bond Bill = -8.07%

a-2. Percentage change in the price of Bond Ted = -21.12%

b-1. Percentage change in the price of Bond Bill = 8.94%

b-1. Percentage change in the price of Bond Ted = 30.77%

c. See the attached excel file for the graph.

d. It tells us that the longer the term of a bond, the greater will be its interest rate risk.

Explanation:

The price of each bond can be calculated using the following excel function:

Bond price = -PV(YTM, NPER, PMT, FV) ........... (1)

Where;

a-1. If interest rates suddenly rise by 2 percent, what is the percentage change in the price of Bond Bill?

YTM = (6.2% + 2%) / Number of semiannuals in a year = 8.2% / 2 = 4.1%

NPER = Number of semiannuals to maturity = 5 * 2 = 10

PMT = Payment = Coupon rate * Face value = (6.2% / Number of semiannuals in a year) * 1000 = (6.2% / 2) * 1000 = $31

FV = Face value = Initial price of Bond Bill = $1,000

Substituting all the values into equation (1), we have:

New price of Bond Bill = -PV(4.1%, 10, 31, 1000)

Inputting =-PV(4.1%, 10, 31, 1000) in a cell in an excel file (Note: As done in the attached excel file), we have:

New price of Bond Bill = $919.29

Percentage change in the price of Bond Bill = ((New price of Bond Bill - Initial price of Bond Bill) / Initial price of Bond Bill) * 100 = (($919.29 - $1,000) / $1,000) * 100 = -8.07%

a-2. If interest rates suddenly rise by 2 percent, what is the percentage change in the price of Bond Ted?

YTM = (6.2% + 2%) / Number of semiannuals in a year = 8.2% / 2 = 4.1%

NPER = Number of semiannuals to maturity = 25 * 2 = 50

PMT = Payment = Coupon rate * Face value = (6.2% / Number of semiannuals in a year) * 1000 = (6.2% / 2) * 1000 = $31

FV = Face value = Initial price of Bond Ted = $1,000

Substituting all the values into equation (1), we have:

New price of Bond Ted = -PV(4.1%, 50, 31, 1000)

Inputting =-PV(4.1%, 50, 31, 1000) in a cell in an excel file (Note: As done in the attached excel file), we have:

New price of Bond Ted = $788.81

Percentage change in the price of Bond Ted = ((New price of Bond Ted - Initial price of Bond Bill Ted) / Initial price of Bond Ted) * 100 = (($788.81 - $1,000) / $1,000) * 100 = -21.12%

b-1. If rates were to suddenly fall by 2 percent instead, what would the percentage change in the price of Bond Bill be then?

YTM = (6.2% - 2%) / Number of semiannuals in a year = 4.2% / 2 = 2.1%

NPER = Number of semiannuals to maturity = 5 * 2 = 10

PMT = Payment = Coupon rate * Face value = (6.2% / Number of semiannuals in a year) * 1000 = (6.2% / 2) * 1000 = $31

FV = Face value = Initial price of Bond Bill = $1,000

Substituting all the values into equation (1), we have:

New price of Bond Bill = -PV(2.1%, 10, 31, 1000)

Inputting =-PV(2.1%, 10, 31, 1000) in a cell in an excel file (Note: As done in the attached excel file), we have:

New price of Bond Bill = $1,089.36

Percentage change in the price of Bond Bill = ((New price of Bond Bill - Initial price of Bond Bill) / Initial price of Bond Bill) * 100 = (($1,089.36 - $1,000) / $1,000) * 100 = 8.94%

b-2. If rates were to suddenly fall by 2 percent instead, what would the percentage change in the price of Bond Ted be then?

rate = new YTM = (6.2% - 2%) / Number of semiannuals in a year = 4.2% / 2 = 2.1%

NPER = Number of semiannuals to maturity = 25 * 2 = 50

PMT = Payment = Coupon rate * Face value = (6.2% / Number of semiannuals in a year) * 1000 = (6.2% / 2) * 1000 = $31

FV = Face value = Initial price of Bond Ted = $1,000

Substituting all the values into equation (1), we have:

New price of Bond Ted = -PV(2.1%, 50, 31, 1000)

Inputting =-PV(2.1%, 50, 31, 1000) in a cell in an excel file (Note: As done in the attached excel file), we have:

New price of Bond Ted = $1,307.73

Percentage change in the price of Bond Ted = ((New price of Bond Ted - Initial price of Bond Bill Ted) / Initial price of Bond Ted) * 100 = (($1,307.73 - $1,000) / $1,000) * 100 = 30.77%

c. Illustrate your answers by graphing bond prices versus YTM.

Note: See the attached excel file for the graph.

d. What does this problem tell you about the interest rate risk of longer-term bonds?

It tells us that the longer the term of a bond, the greater will be its interest rate risk.

Download xlsx
6 0
2 years ago
On July 1, 2019, Sheffield Corp. pays $20,700 to Kalter Insurance Co. for a 3-year insurance contract. Both companies have fisca
11111nata11111 [884]

Explanation:

The journal entries are as follows:

On July 1

Prepaid Insurance A/c Dr $20,700

           To Cash A/c $20,700

(Being prepaid insurance is paid)

On December 31

Insurance expense A/c Dr $

          To Prepaid insurance A/c $1,110

(Being the insurance expense is recorded)

The insurance expense is shown below:

= $20,700 ÷ 3 years × 6 months ÷ 12 months

= $3,450

3 0
3 years ago
Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%. a.
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

a. The answers are as follows:

(i) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 4%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0

(ii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 6.25%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.25

(iii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 8.50%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.50

(iv) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 10.75%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.75

(v) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 13%; and Beta of Portfolio = 1.0

b. Change in expected return = 9% increase

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as part b of it is omitted. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%.

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

The explanation to the answers are now provided as follows:

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

To calculate these, we use the following formula:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (WS&P * RS&P) + (WT * RT) ………… (1)

Beta of Portfolio = (WS&P * BS&P) + (WT * BT) ………………..………………. (2)

Where;

WS&P = Weight of S&P = (1) – (1v)

RS&P = Return of S&P = 13%, or 0.13

WT = Weight of T-bills = 1 – WS&P

RT = Return of T-bills = 4%, or 0.04

BS&P = 1.0

BT = 0

After substituting the values into equation (1) & (2), we therefore have:

(i) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0 (i.e. WS&P = 0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0) * 0.04) = 0.04, or 4%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0) * 0) = 0

(ii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.25 (i.e. WS&P = 0.25)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.25 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0.04) = 0.0625, or 6.25%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.25 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0) = 0.25

(iii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.50 (i.e. WS&P = 0.50)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.50 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0.04) = 0.0850, or 8.50%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.50 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0) = 0.50

(iv) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.75 (i.e. WS&P = 0.75)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.75 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0.04) = 0.1075, or 10.75%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.75 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0) = 0.75

(v) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 1.0 (i.e. WS&P = 1.0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (1.0 * 0.13) + ((1 – 1.0) * 0.04) = 0.13, or 13%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (1.0 * 1.0) + (1 – 1.0) * 0) = 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

There expected return will increase by the percentage of the difference between Expected Return and Risk free rate. That is;

Change in expected return = Expected Return - Risk free rate = 13% - 4% = 9% increase

4 0
3 years ago
Sheffield Corp. makes and sells umbrellas. The company is in the process of preparing its Selling and Administrative Expense Bud
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

How much is the total budgeted variable selling and administrative expenses for October?

  • $17,150

Explanation:

                                  Variable Cost          Fixed Cost        Total costs

                                  <u>   Per Unit        </u>        <u>                    </u>       <u>for 7,000 units</u>

Sales commissions        $0.60                     $7,000              $11,200

Shipping                          $1.20                                                $8,400

Advertising                     $0.30                                                $2,100

Executive salaries                                       $34,000           $34,000

Depreciation                                                  $8,000             $8,000

<u>Other                              $0.35                    $28,000           $30,450</u>

TOTAL                            $2.45                    $77,000            $94,150

How much is the total budgeted variable selling and administrative expenses for October?

total variable costs per unit = $2.45 x 7,000 units = $17,150

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The percentage change in the quantity demanded of film divided by the percentage change in the price of cameras indicates:
    8·1 answer
  • Lasch Co. recorded a right-of-use asset of... I. Lasch Co. recorded a right-of-use asset of $200,000 in a 10-year operating leas
    6·1 answer
  • Franklin reviews financial data of a company to ensure accurate and complete information. Which job title does he most likely ha
    15·2 answers
  • A downhill ski area is experiencing a decline in the number of lift tickets sold, falling revenues, and inadequate profits. The
    5·1 answer
  • Tanya Fletcher owns undeveloped land (adjusted basis of $80,000 and fair market value of $92,000) on the East Coast. On January
    5·1 answer
  • Outsourcing: Question 19 options: Transfers traditional internal activities to outside vendors. Utilizes the efficiency which co
    7·1 answer
  • The PC Works assembles custom computers from components supplied by various manufacturers. The company is very small and its ass
    9·1 answer
  • What is a commodity?
    5·2 answers
  • Suppose a stock had an initial price of $50 per share, paid a dividend of $.80 per share during the year, and had an ending shar
    10·1 answer
  • In the context of loss aversion, identify a true statement about sunk-cost fallacy. Multiple Choice People are reluctant to give
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!